Support Good photo with strong EV. I'd note though that a cropped version is currently in the bio article - I don't think that the crop is actually better in that context. I also don't love the barbies at the front of the photo being out of focus, but suspect that this was unavoidable given camera technology at the time.
Nick-D (
talk) 23:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Also the restored version
Nick-D (
talk) 08:41, 31 July 2023 (UTC)reply
I think it's probably fair to say as well that for most uses of the time, which would have been newspaper halftone, the focus wouldn't have mattered that much. I think we're lucky that photos of the period tend to be as good as they are. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.5% of all
FPs. 18:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Support (restored).
MER-C 10:16, 30 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Support Good photo with strong EV. I'd note though that a cropped version is currently in the bio article - I don't think that the crop is actually better in that context. I also don't love the barbies at the front of the photo being out of focus, but suspect that this was unavoidable given camera technology at the time.
Nick-D (
talk) 23:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Also the restored version
Nick-D (
talk) 08:41, 31 July 2023 (UTC)reply
I think it's probably fair to say as well that for most uses of the time, which would have been newspaper halftone, the focus wouldn't have mattered that much. I think we're lucky that photos of the period tend to be as good as they are. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.5% of all
FPs. 18:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Support (restored).
MER-C 10:16, 30 July 2023 (UTC)reply