I think it's fairly notable that this is the earliest known depiction of a European cannon. However, I'm not sure if that grain is from the photograph, or from the age of the diagram.
Oppose for graininess. I'm pretty sure it's the image file; a JPG image of that size saved at high quality would be far larger than 1.06 MB. howcheng {
chat} 19:47, 11 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose Nice image, very poor scan. --
mikaultalk 13:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment Well, you guys seem pretty sure that the grain is from the photograph/scan, so I'll withdraw the nomination (I assume I'm allowed to? If not I'll just oppose as well). ·
AndonicOHail! 14:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Not promoted --
jjron (
talk) 13:16, 13 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Nomination withdrawn.
I think it's fairly notable that this is the earliest known depiction of a European cannon. However, I'm not sure if that grain is from the photograph, or from the age of the diagram.
Oppose for graininess. I'm pretty sure it's the image file; a JPG image of that size saved at high quality would be far larger than 1.06 MB. howcheng {
chat} 19:47, 11 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose Nice image, very poor scan. --
mikaultalk 13:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment Well, you guys seem pretty sure that the grain is from the photograph/scan, so I'll withdraw the nomination (I assume I'm allowed to? If not I'll just oppose as well). ·
AndonicOHail! 14:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Not promoted --
jjron (
talk) 13:16, 13 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Nomination withdrawn.