Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2015 at 12:27:38 (UTC)
Reason
Let's get this out of the way first: It's below the suggested minimums. However, it's also the best photograph of Sousa I can find, with a pose and positioning that gives a bit of life and warmth to the image. It's so much better than the higher-resolution images in that respect that I'd like to propose it first.
Oppose. Sorry, I'm not sold on this one- the size is one issue, but I'm not convinced that it's a fantastic image anyway (I lack the vocab to explain, but the pixellation is what is bothering me- is this the scan or the original?). This may be the best image of the subject we have, but that doesn't mean it should be featured.
J Milburn (
talk) 23:56, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose Agree with J Milburn. Presumabably this actual photography still exists, and a better scan can be taken, unless I'm mistaken?
Mattximus (
talk) 01:19, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Elmer Chickering - John Philip Sousa.jpg --
ArmbrustTheHomunculus 12:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment: I appreciate that this is the "right" closure, but may there not be some utility in holding a nomination open for a little longer if an objection is raised at a late stage? Or at least asking other supporters to clarify their view in light of the new objection?
J Milburn (
talk) 16:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
If you raise an objection at a late stage, than you can notify the other supporters on their talk pages/ping them to make them aware.
ArmbrustTheHomunculus 17:10, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
@
J Milburn: As for the pixelization, I presume that's film grain. There's a couple larger Elmer Chickering photos of Sousa, and they do have similar effects on them. Adam Cuerden(
talk) 19:45, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Noted, thanks for the clarification.
J Milburn (
talk) 19:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
As for the background, I presume it's some sort of dry brush. Adam Cuerden(
talk) 20:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2015 at 12:27:38 (UTC)
Reason
Let's get this out of the way first: It's below the suggested minimums. However, it's also the best photograph of Sousa I can find, with a pose and positioning that gives a bit of life and warmth to the image. It's so much better than the higher-resolution images in that respect that I'd like to propose it first.
Oppose. Sorry, I'm not sold on this one- the size is one issue, but I'm not convinced that it's a fantastic image anyway (I lack the vocab to explain, but the pixellation is what is bothering me- is this the scan or the original?). This may be the best image of the subject we have, but that doesn't mean it should be featured.
J Milburn (
talk) 23:56, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose Agree with J Milburn. Presumabably this actual photography still exists, and a better scan can be taken, unless I'm mistaken?
Mattximus (
talk) 01:19, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Elmer Chickering - John Philip Sousa.jpg --
ArmbrustTheHomunculus 12:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment: I appreciate that this is the "right" closure, but may there not be some utility in holding a nomination open for a little longer if an objection is raised at a late stage? Or at least asking other supporters to clarify their view in light of the new objection?
J Milburn (
talk) 16:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
If you raise an objection at a late stage, than you can notify the other supporters on their talk pages/ping them to make them aware.
ArmbrustTheHomunculus 17:10, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
@
J Milburn: As for the pixelization, I presume that's film grain. There's a couple larger Elmer Chickering photos of Sousa, and they do have similar effects on them. Adam Cuerden(
talk) 19:45, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Noted, thanks for the clarification.
J Milburn (
talk) 19:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
As for the background, I presume it's some sort of dry brush. Adam Cuerden(
talk) 20:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply