Please clarify that in the caption.
Nergaal (
talk) 03:08, 14 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Support Worst you could say about this is that it might be a tiny bit overexposed. Excellent image with high resolution. Adam Cuerden(
talk) 13:15, 12 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Support Excellent technical quality. The encyclopedic value cannot be doubted either. Based on a quick visual inspection I see little or no evidence of overexposure (but I have not checked it carefully).
Purpy Pupple (
talk) 01:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Support Excellent work. —
ΛΧΣ21 06:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Please clarify that in the caption.
Nergaal (
talk) 03:08, 14 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Support Worst you could say about this is that it might be a tiny bit overexposed. Excellent image with high resolution. Adam Cuerden(
talk) 13:15, 12 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Support Excellent technical quality. The encyclopedic value cannot be doubted either. Based on a quick visual inspection I see little or no evidence of overexposure (but I have not checked it carefully).
Purpy Pupple (
talk) 01:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Support Excellent work. —
ΛΧΣ21 06:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)reply