Oppose – good EV, but excessive perspective distortion and blown highlights (clouds).
Bammesk (
talk) 12:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment – I corrected the perspective (uploaded over original, purge cache if not visible). The clouds will inevitably blow when photographing the shaded side of a building. --
Janke |
Talk 13:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Much better, however I would keep my vote, it is generally not a sharp photo, particularly on left side. It has good EV though.
Bammesk (
talk) 14:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment – Is a three-quarter or oblique view showing (some of) the side of the bldg. possible?
Sca (
talk) 14:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
@
Sca: Yes (see below). Both images were taken within minutes of each other.
Jackdude101talkcont 15:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Took the liberty of fixing the distortion on this one, too. However, the thick cables over the building mar the image IMO. --
Janke |
Talk 19:05, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
• Yes, I'd support the oblique view if
Jackdude would care to make it an alt, although it could be cropped tighter on both sides. More visual information. And the front-on original seems rather static, IMO.
Sca (
talk) 21:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
@
Sca: Okay, that can be an alt image. I added an expanded description to its Commons page and cropped it.
Jackdude101talkcont 22:22, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Support Alternate. –
Sca (
talk) 23:31, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Oppose crop is way too close, cables are distracting in alt. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 01:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Oppose – good EV, but excessive perspective distortion and blown highlights (clouds).
Bammesk (
talk) 12:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment – I corrected the perspective (uploaded over original, purge cache if not visible). The clouds will inevitably blow when photographing the shaded side of a building. --
Janke |
Talk 13:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Much better, however I would keep my vote, it is generally not a sharp photo, particularly on left side. It has good EV though.
Bammesk (
talk) 14:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment – Is a three-quarter or oblique view showing (some of) the side of the bldg. possible?
Sca (
talk) 14:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
@
Sca: Yes (see below). Both images were taken within minutes of each other.
Jackdude101talkcont 15:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Took the liberty of fixing the distortion on this one, too. However, the thick cables over the building mar the image IMO. --
Janke |
Talk 19:05, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
• Yes, I'd support the oblique view if
Jackdude would care to make it an alt, although it could be cropped tighter on both sides. More visual information. And the front-on original seems rather static, IMO.
Sca (
talk) 21:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
@
Sca: Okay, that can be an alt image. I added an expanded description to its Commons page and cropped it.
Jackdude101talkcont 22:22, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Support Alternate. –
Sca (
talk) 23:31, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Oppose crop is way too close, cables are distracting in alt. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 01:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC)reply