Support - can't be nit-picky or split hairs over this one.
Belle (
talk) 00:25, 16 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Support – as per Belle. LoL.
Yann (
talk) 08:37, 17 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment – Disappointing that this particular comb lacks more refined & thus interesting 50/50 division into thin and thicker teeth. (I use the thin ones for combing eyebrows.)
Sca (
talk) 22:18, 17 June 2015 (UTC)reply
If the comb article were in better shape, it could support more such images. A comb at its most basic, however.... —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 23:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Support - can't be nit-picky or split hairs over this one.
Belle (
talk) 00:25, 16 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Support – as per Belle. LoL.
Yann (
talk) 08:37, 17 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment – Disappointing that this particular comb lacks more refined & thus interesting 50/50 division into thin and thicker teeth. (I use the thin ones for combing eyebrows.)
Sca (
talk) 22:18, 17 June 2015 (UTC)reply
If the comb article were in better shape, it could support more such images. A comb at its most basic, however.... —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 23:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)reply