Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 11:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Support – Detailed capture of Chief Joseph, probably showing his features better than some other period pics, such as
this one (featured in
Battle of the Clearwater). Now leads target bio infobox. A hero to Native Americans. –
Sca (
talk) 14:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Aye. Think the 1874 pic has some justification for the events in 1874. The old lead image, though, was a photograph of a drawing - or at minimum, a photo so extremely retouched by Victorians to be indistinguishable from one[1] - which is surely the worst possibility Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 18:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Book: Merril Beal: I Will Fight No More Forever: Chief Joseph and the Nez Perce War (1963). –
Sca (
talk) 15:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Sca,
MER-C,
Yann, and
Charlesjsharp: Made a few additional fixes to the light spot in the upper left: It varies between copies of this, and the copy from the Smithsonian is on the most visible side. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 17:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Fair point. Political, then. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 13:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Chief Joseph by Edward Sheriff Curtis.jpg --
ArmbrustTheHomunculus 14:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)reply
^That's apparently a thing. Something about reproducing photos of photos of photos and adding details back in. More common with daguerrotypes, where there isn't an easy way to reproduce them.
Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 11:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Support – Detailed capture of Chief Joseph, probably showing his features better than some other period pics, such as
this one (featured in
Battle of the Clearwater). Now leads target bio infobox. A hero to Native Americans. –
Sca (
talk) 14:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Aye. Think the 1874 pic has some justification for the events in 1874. The old lead image, though, was a photograph of a drawing - or at minimum, a photo so extremely retouched by Victorians to be indistinguishable from one[1] - which is surely the worst possibility Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 18:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Book: Merril Beal: I Will Fight No More Forever: Chief Joseph and the Nez Perce War (1963). –
Sca (
talk) 15:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Sca,
MER-C,
Yann, and
Charlesjsharp: Made a few additional fixes to the light spot in the upper left: It varies between copies of this, and the copy from the Smithsonian is on the most visible side. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 17:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Fair point. Political, then. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 13:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Chief Joseph by Edward Sheriff Curtis.jpg --
ArmbrustTheHomunculus 14:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)reply
^That's apparently a thing. Something about reproducing photos of photos of photos and adding details back in. More common with daguerrotypes, where there isn't an easy way to reproduce them.