The article was kept by DrKay via FACBot ( talk) 8:06, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because, as pointed out by Hog Farm in September, this article has large amounts of uncited text and a history section whose prose is disconnected. I agree with this assessment, and I would add that I think the lede needs to be expanded, its usage needs to be updated (as the last entry is from 2011) and a search for additional sources might be warranted. Z1720 ( talk) 00:40, 5 October 2022 (UTC) reply
Hopefully this will help expand the article. Z1720 ( talk) 01:41, 7 October 2022 (UTC) reply
Close without FARC: the initial nomination raised problems of sourcing and comprehensiveness; I can see no remnant of these problems in the article. Perhaps I would recommend one or two more sentences in the lead, but I do not believe that to be any more than a personal preference. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 15:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC) reply
Needs attribution of opinions and citations. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 21:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Once these are closed, I think the article is probably decent enough to close the FAR as kept. I don't think this is our best featured article, but I'm not seeing anything that warrants delisting now that the unsourced content and attribution issues have been resolved. Hog Farm Talk 02:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC) reply
The article was kept by DrKay via FACBot ( talk) 8:06, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because, as pointed out by Hog Farm in September, this article has large amounts of uncited text and a history section whose prose is disconnected. I agree with this assessment, and I would add that I think the lede needs to be expanded, its usage needs to be updated (as the last entry is from 2011) and a search for additional sources might be warranted. Z1720 ( talk) 00:40, 5 October 2022 (UTC) reply
Hopefully this will help expand the article. Z1720 ( talk) 01:41, 7 October 2022 (UTC) reply
Close without FARC: the initial nomination raised problems of sourcing and comprehensiveness; I can see no remnant of these problems in the article. Perhaps I would recommend one or two more sentences in the lead, but I do not believe that to be any more than a personal preference. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 15:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC) reply
Needs attribution of opinions and citations. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 21:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Once these are closed, I think the article is probably decent enough to close the FAR as kept. I don't think this is our best featured article, but I'm not seeing anything that warrants delisting now that the unsourced content and attribution issues have been resolved. Hog Farm Talk 02:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC) reply