The article was delisted by Casliber via FACBot ( talk) 9:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC) [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because, for the past year or so, the article has been heavily edited by a number of users, which is highly unusual for an article of Featured Status. Many of these are far from minor edits, even going as far as to change the entire structure of parts of the article (take these edits, for instance). I've also noticed that a lot of new information has been added, with entire paragraphs and sections now lacking any sort of citation. An example of this is the Skills and abilities section, which includes four paragraphs of detailed, specific information without a citation in sight. Then there's the fact that the citation style of the article is largely inconsistent. At this point, I will be very surprised if this article still meets Featured Article criteria. Dark Knight 2149 19:12, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
I agree with your nomination for review. The "Abilities" section as a whole is certainly lacking citations. Also, the "Fictional character biography" section should perhaps be given its own article so the subsections can appropriately be expanded upon. DrRC ( talk) 19:48, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Argento Surfer ( talk) 20:25, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Perhaps the situation could be rectified if we simply reverted the whole page back to the status that it was at when it gained FA status to start with? Midnightblueowl ( talk) 23:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Casliber via FACBot ( talk) 9:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC) [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because, for the past year or so, the article has been heavily edited by a number of users, which is highly unusual for an article of Featured Status. Many of these are far from minor edits, even going as far as to change the entire structure of parts of the article (take these edits, for instance). I've also noticed that a lot of new information has been added, with entire paragraphs and sections now lacking any sort of citation. An example of this is the Skills and abilities section, which includes four paragraphs of detailed, specific information without a citation in sight. Then there's the fact that the citation style of the article is largely inconsistent. At this point, I will be very surprised if this article still meets Featured Article criteria. Dark Knight 2149 19:12, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
I agree with your nomination for review. The "Abilities" section as a whole is certainly lacking citations. Also, the "Fictional character biography" section should perhaps be given its own article so the subsections can appropriately be expanded upon. DrRC ( talk) 19:48, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Argento Surfer ( talk) 20:25, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Perhaps the situation could be rectified if we simply reverted the whole page back to the status that it was at when it gained FA status to start with? Midnightblueowl ( talk) 23:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC) reply