The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 03:16, 21 December 2008 [1].
I'm nominating this article for featured article because... It has been improved greatly and is an interesting subject. TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 22:00, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment: The lead is simply a list of Cordray's previous offices. What about WP:LEAD? Dablinks and a deadlink need sorting. Will read on. Brianboulton ( talk) 00:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments -
Comment: Tony, can you explain more clearly what's going on in the third paragraph of the Early legislative career section. It sounds like some sort of gerrymandering attempt; I realise you have to be careful with your words, but at present it's incomprehensible. In particular, what does "...so that incumbent Democrats were in the same district in nine specific districts" mean?
Brianboulton (
talk) 00:16, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
Further comments
Brianboulton ( talk) 22:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Brianboulton ( talk) 17:17, 15 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Support: I have copyedited the article, and have negotiated for several amendments which have been amicably agreed with the main editor. The article is both comprehensive and well illustrated, very thoroughly cited. An imformative piece of work about US politics at state level, dealing with someone who might—who knows—be a star of the future. Ref [30] now works, but I couldn't get to [20] on either of my browsers (Mozilla Firefox and Internet Explorer), though I'm not withholding support for that. Brianboulton ( talk) 18:26, 17 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Support I copy-edited the article slightly and clarified some legal matters. In the past I also added US Supreme Court case citations. The article, in my opinion, has no serious problems and satisfies FA criteria now. Ruslik ( talk) 20:18, 17 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 03:16, 21 December 2008 [1].
I'm nominating this article for featured article because... It has been improved greatly and is an interesting subject. TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 22:00, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment: The lead is simply a list of Cordray's previous offices. What about WP:LEAD? Dablinks and a deadlink need sorting. Will read on. Brianboulton ( talk) 00:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments -
Comment: Tony, can you explain more clearly what's going on in the third paragraph of the Early legislative career section. It sounds like some sort of gerrymandering attempt; I realise you have to be careful with your words, but at present it's incomprehensible. In particular, what does "...so that incumbent Democrats were in the same district in nine specific districts" mean?
Brianboulton (
talk) 00:16, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
Further comments
Brianboulton ( talk) 22:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Brianboulton ( talk) 17:17, 15 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Support: I have copyedited the article, and have negotiated for several amendments which have been amicably agreed with the main editor. The article is both comprehensive and well illustrated, very thoroughly cited. An imformative piece of work about US politics at state level, dealing with someone who might—who knows—be a star of the future. Ref [30] now works, but I couldn't get to [20] on either of my browsers (Mozilla Firefox and Internet Explorer), though I'm not withholding support for that. Brianboulton ( talk) 18:26, 17 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Support I copy-edited the article slightly and clarified some legal matters. In the past I also added US Supreme Court case citations. The article, in my opinion, has no serious problems and satisfies FA criteria now. Ruslik ( talk) 20:18, 17 December 2008 (UTC) reply