The article was promoted 00:58, 26 February 2008.
I'll be checking to see if improvements are made, although if I forget to check (which is quite possible), it would be good of you to reply to me. bibliomaniac 1 5 00:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments:
A decent article, but there are errors, as well as disappointing prose. I hope that this helps. Ashnard Talk Contribs 17:16, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
So let me know your thoughts, and if there are more corrections. :) Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 19:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted 00:58, 26 February 2008.
I'll be checking to see if improvements are made, although if I forget to check (which is quite possible), it would be good of you to reply to me. bibliomaniac 1 5 00:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments:
A decent article, but there are errors, as well as disappointing prose. I hope that this helps. Ashnard Talk Contribs 17:16, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
So let me know your thoughts, and if there are more corrections. :) Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 19:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply