The article was promoted by Karanacs 15:11, 28 April 2009 [1].
I am nominating this for featured article as part of the South Park Featured Topic Drive. It just passed as a GA and I'm now pursuing an FAC. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn ( contribs) 14:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply
oppose invalid FU rationale for File:Southpark_ep108_2.jpg Fasach Nua ( talk) 21:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Other than the image, I'd be inclined to support. But it really is the main objection into what is otherwise a really good article. Sceptre ( talk) 14:26, 11 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Please make sure that all sentences that contain a quotation have a citation at the end of the sentence. This might mean that citations are duplicated in subsequent sentences, but that is okay. Karanacs ( talk) 16:43, 21 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Question regarding sourcing—why aren't books such as South Park and Philosophy: You Know, I Learned Something Today, South Park and Philosophy: Bigger, Longer, and More Penetrating, South Park Conservatives: The Revolt Against Liberal Media Bias and South Park Republican (maybe more, I just copied these from Template:South Park) used as sources? I don't think this article can be considered comprehensive if none of them are consulted at all. For eg: see any Simpsons episode FA, where there is quite a bit of analysis from academic books. indopug ( talk) 16:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by Karanacs 15:11, 28 April 2009 [1].
I am nominating this for featured article as part of the South Park Featured Topic Drive. It just passed as a GA and I'm now pursuing an FAC. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn ( contribs) 14:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply
oppose invalid FU rationale for File:Southpark_ep108_2.jpg Fasach Nua ( talk) 21:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Other than the image, I'd be inclined to support. But it really is the main objection into what is otherwise a really good article. Sceptre ( talk) 14:26, 11 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Please make sure that all sentences that contain a quotation have a citation at the end of the sentence. This might mean that citations are duplicated in subsequent sentences, but that is okay. Karanacs ( talk) 16:43, 21 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Question regarding sourcing—why aren't books such as South Park and Philosophy: You Know, I Learned Something Today, South Park and Philosophy: Bigger, Longer, and More Penetrating, South Park Conservatives: The Revolt Against Liberal Media Bias and South Park Republican (maybe more, I just copied these from Template:South Park) used as sources? I don't think this article can be considered comprehensive if none of them are consulted at all. For eg: see any Simpsons episode FA, where there is quite a bit of analysis from academic books. indopug ( talk) 16:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC) reply