Withdrawn FAC nomination (not subsequently archived), taken from [1]

1755 Lisbon earthquake

Removed this nomination because i agree with mav but i am not in the mood right now to pursue the suggested improvements. If anybody can volunteer, i would be happy to read! Muriel 21:01, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)

i am very proud of this one. Muriel 08:10, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)

• Pictures should be added directly to the article, I think. —Eloquence
  • Pictures from the XVIII century?? :) What do you suggest? Muriel 16:24, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)
    • A google image search provides some suggestions of contemporary images: [2], [3] & [4]. fabiform | talk 16:41, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)
• Support. jengod
• Oppose until the lead section gets expanded. The lead section needs to be able to stand alone as a concise article in its own right. See news style. -- mav 20:22, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • Dear mav, can you elaborate on your criticism? I'm not sure if i understood and i cant improve the article if i dont. Muriel 10:15, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
    • The section starting "The 1755 Lisbon earthquake took place on..." needs to be expanded (at least a few more sentences - if not a second paragraph as well) to cover all the major points that are expanded on later in the article. --mav
• Think there should be a reference to Oliver Wendell Holmes's poem, "The Deacon's Masterpiece: or the Wonderful One-Hoss Shay. Why? Because I first heard about the Lisbon earthquake in reference to this poem and to the theological disputes to which it refers. Dpbsmith 15:20, 14 Mar 2004 (UTC)