Demoted in 2020 once Ceres lost its Featured status, that article getting its star back, along with how all the nine that appear atop the
Dwarf planet article are Good or better, should be enough for this topic to be restored. --
igordebraga≠ 05:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Support - Good to see this complete again. Maybe also consider renominating the
Asteroid belt GT as well? It was demoted for the same reason as this one. --
ZooBlazer 20:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Support: I brought this one up on the talk page a while back, but didn't feel up to re-nominating it. I'm a bit iffy about the inclusion of
IAU definition of planet- it feels off-topic, to me. -- — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
SilverTiger12 (
talk •
contribs)
Kept that article simply because it was in the original topic.
igordebraga≠ 03:42, 28 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I'd suggest removing it as not really part of the topic.
SilverTiger12 (
talk) 21:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
I think it's relevant to include since the IAU established the concept of a dwarf planet in 2006.
Reywas92Talk 23:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Probably not needed after all. It isn't exclusively about dwarf planets, so it may be outside the topic's scope, but if others feel it should remain, I won't fight it. --
ZooBlazer 07:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Support Brilliant topic and work and I'd agree with the others that the IAU definition of a planet article probably doesn't need to be included.
NapHit (
talk) 23:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Drive by support - I love the quality of planetary articles. ♫
Hurricanehink (
talk) 18:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Support. Glad to know people can read high-quality articles about dwarf planets.
TWOrantulaTM (
enter the web) 19:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Support - Per nom. It's always nice seeing the littler members of the Solar System receive due recognition! I will point out that there was a
recent debate over whether Orcus should be listed as a "consensus dwarf planet" or not, with a tentative conclusion that it is better treated as a borderline object like
120347 Salacia, so Orcus may have to be removed from the topic.
ArkHyena (
talk) 06:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
If so, removing it just to be safe.
igordebraga≠ 18:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support, though I feel this is one that'll have to be changed a lot in the coming decades!
Generalissima (
talk) (it/she) 17:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support; good work and, FWIW, I agree with removing IAU definition of planet. QueenofHearts 19:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Closing with consensus to promote.--NØ 06:20, 21 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Demoted in 2020 once Ceres lost its Featured status, that article getting its star back, along with how all the nine that appear atop the
Dwarf planet article are Good or better, should be enough for this topic to be restored. --
igordebraga≠ 05:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Support - Good to see this complete again. Maybe also consider renominating the
Asteroid belt GT as well? It was demoted for the same reason as this one. --
ZooBlazer 20:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Support: I brought this one up on the talk page a while back, but didn't feel up to re-nominating it. I'm a bit iffy about the inclusion of
IAU definition of planet- it feels off-topic, to me. -- — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
SilverTiger12 (
talk •
contribs)
Kept that article simply because it was in the original topic.
igordebraga≠ 03:42, 28 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I'd suggest removing it as not really part of the topic.
SilverTiger12 (
talk) 21:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
I think it's relevant to include since the IAU established the concept of a dwarf planet in 2006.
Reywas92Talk 23:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Probably not needed after all. It isn't exclusively about dwarf planets, so it may be outside the topic's scope, but if others feel it should remain, I won't fight it. --
ZooBlazer 07:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Support Brilliant topic and work and I'd agree with the others that the IAU definition of a planet article probably doesn't need to be included.
NapHit (
talk) 23:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Drive by support - I love the quality of planetary articles. ♫
Hurricanehink (
talk) 18:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Support. Glad to know people can read high-quality articles about dwarf planets.
TWOrantulaTM (
enter the web) 19:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Support - Per nom. It's always nice seeing the littler members of the Solar System receive due recognition! I will point out that there was a
recent debate over whether Orcus should be listed as a "consensus dwarf planet" or not, with a tentative conclusion that it is better treated as a borderline object like
120347 Salacia, so Orcus may have to be removed from the topic.
ArkHyena (
talk) 06:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
If so, removing it just to be safe.
igordebraga≠ 18:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support, though I feel this is one that'll have to be changed a lot in the coming decades!
Generalissima (
talk) (it/she) 17:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support; good work and, FWIW, I agree with removing IAU definition of planet. QueenofHearts 19:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Closing with consensus to promote.--NØ 06:20, 21 April 2024 (UTC)reply