 | This is an
essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been
thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
There is an abundance of fancruft on Wikipedia. Fancruft generally falls into two categories:
- Copyright violations: Stuff that's directly pulled from copyrighted material and is unoriginal to the point that it is a derivative work that cannot be released under the GFDL. [1]
- Fan analysis: Stuff that's pulled from copyrighted material, but created enough original fan analysis to the point that it is a derivative work which is unencyclopedic, but legal.
An example of this is the Back to the Future timeline. Is it an original work? If you say no, it is a copyright violation. If you say yes, then it is in violation of WP:SYNTH and should therefore be deleted.
| This is an
essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been
thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
There is an abundance of fancruft on Wikipedia. Fancruft generally falls into two categories:
- Copyright violations: Stuff that's directly pulled from copyrighted material and is unoriginal to the point that it is a derivative work that cannot be released under the GFDL. [1]
- Fan analysis: Stuff that's pulled from copyrighted material, but created enough original fan analysis to the point that it is a derivative work which is unencyclopedic, but legal.
An example of this is the Back to the Future timeline. Is it an original work? If you say no, it is a copyright violation. If you say yes, then it is in violation of WP:SYNTH and should therefore be deleted.