From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

28 October 2020

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Wilbert Wynnberg ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( restore)

I would like to recreate the page in a neutral tone because more notable content is now available on the subject. WonkaCrist ( talk) 12:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC) reply

  • It's OK: you can. Please feel free to write your draft at Draft:Wilbert Wynnberg and submit it via the Articles for Creation process once you're confident that it meets our rules.— S Marshall  T/ C 13:22, 28 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - In case anyone else is as confused as I was, it appears, on checking the history, that there was a previous draft, about a year ago, and that it was deleted as G11, and the filer is asking to submit a neutral draft. Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • There is already a draft. At the moment it's not coming close to meeting WP:GNG so it will stay there. I'm not a big fan of the AfC scheme, but in this case, I think it's the best way forward. Hobit ( talk) 21:38, 29 October 2020 (UTC) reply
    There is now, but there wasn't when this DRV opened.— S Marshall  T/ C 22:39, 29 October 2020 (UTC) reply
    Ah, I'd missed that. Thanks! Hobit ( talk) 03:34, 30 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Allow the draft to remain in draft - The draft isn't G11 spam. It also has no references, and so it will be declined in draft, but that is a reason to decline a draft, not to delete it. Robert McClenon ( talk) 22:34, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

28 October 2020

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Wilbert Wynnberg ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( restore)

I would like to recreate the page in a neutral tone because more notable content is now available on the subject. WonkaCrist ( talk) 12:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC) reply

  • It's OK: you can. Please feel free to write your draft at Draft:Wilbert Wynnberg and submit it via the Articles for Creation process once you're confident that it meets our rules.— S Marshall  T/ C 13:22, 28 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - In case anyone else is as confused as I was, it appears, on checking the history, that there was a previous draft, about a year ago, and that it was deleted as G11, and the filer is asking to submit a neutral draft. Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • There is already a draft. At the moment it's not coming close to meeting WP:GNG so it will stay there. I'm not a big fan of the AfC scheme, but in this case, I think it's the best way forward. Hobit ( talk) 21:38, 29 October 2020 (UTC) reply
    There is now, but there wasn't when this DRV opened.— S Marshall  T/ C 22:39, 29 October 2020 (UTC) reply
    Ah, I'd missed that. Thanks! Hobit ( talk) 03:34, 30 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Allow the draft to remain in draft - The draft isn't G11 spam. It also has no references, and so it will be declined in draft, but that is a reason to decline a draft, not to delete it. Robert McClenon ( talk) 22:34, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook