I would like to recreate the page in a neutral tone because more notable content is now available on the subject.
WonkaCrist (
talk) 12:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
It's OK: you can. Please feel free to write your draft at
Draft:Wilbert Wynnberg and submit it via the Articles for Creation process once you're confident that it meets our rules.—
S MarshallT/
C 13:22, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment - In case anyone else is as confused as I was, it appears, on checking the history, that there was a previous draft, about a year ago, and that it was deleted as
G11, and the filer is asking to submit a neutral draft.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 16:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
There is already a draft. At the moment it's not coming close to meeting
WP:GNG so it will stay there. I'm not a big fan of the AfC scheme, but in this case, I think it's the best way forward.
Hobit (
talk) 21:38, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
There is now, but there wasn't when this DRV opened.—
S MarshallT/
C 22:39, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Allow the draft to remain in draft - The draft isn't
G11 spam. It also has no references, and so it will be declined in draft, but that is a reason to decline a draft, not to delete it.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 22:34, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is an archive of the
deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
I would like to recreate the page in a neutral tone because more notable content is now available on the subject.
WonkaCrist (
talk) 12:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
It's OK: you can. Please feel free to write your draft at
Draft:Wilbert Wynnberg and submit it via the Articles for Creation process once you're confident that it meets our rules.—
S MarshallT/
C 13:22, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment - In case anyone else is as confused as I was, it appears, on checking the history, that there was a previous draft, about a year ago, and that it was deleted as
G11, and the filer is asking to submit a neutral draft.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 16:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
There is already a draft. At the moment it's not coming close to meeting
WP:GNG so it will stay there. I'm not a big fan of the AfC scheme, but in this case, I think it's the best way forward.
Hobit (
talk) 21:38, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
There is now, but there wasn't when this DRV opened.—
S MarshallT/
C 22:39, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Allow the draft to remain in draft - The draft isn't
G11 spam. It also has no references, and so it will be declined in draft, but that is a reason to decline a draft, not to delete it.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 22:34, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is an archive of the
deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.