Rashidah De Vore ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( XfD| restore)

This page was deleted in 2015. Since then, the person has started several media companies, including X On Demand [1], a social media and video on demand streaming hybrid with a focus on Black entertainment - the first of its kind, it's sister company X Marks The Black Productions, and parent company X Marks The Black Holdings [2] with press features in Uptown Magazine [3], The Network Journal [4], Black Girl Nerds [5], Authority Magazine [6] and more. Rara2538 ( talk) 23:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC) reply

As far as I can tell, none of the notability guidelines mention anything about quantity of media companies formed as a metric. Given nothing more specific has the subject themself been the subject of non-trivial coverage in reliable third party reliable sources? -- 81.108.53.238 ( talk) 22:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC) reply

• If you think the subject is notable then you can just write another article about them. The deleted one is not going to be of any help to you there. It was very short and only contained the subject's full name, date of birth, nationality, place of residence (New York City) and occupation (TV actress). It cited no sources other than IMDB, which is not usually considered reliable here. Hut 8.5 20:20, 4 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Plini ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( XfD| restore)

This was deleted back in 2014 and later salted. Since then, the person has received substantial coverage. This includes multiple articles in MusicRadar (owned by Future plc) [7] [8] [9], an hour-long interview with Guitar Player [10], an in-depth article with Australian music magazine Mixdown [11], a concert review in Metal Injection [12]. I think it's safe to allow recreation of this article. feminist ( talk) 10:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC) reply

• Normally DRV asks for a draft before unsalting. (Before you ask, Draft:Plini is unlikely to convince anyone; the only things I see salvageable in it are the image and the by-now out-of-date discography.) — Cryptic 11:01, 28 February 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Draft started and can be expanded by others. feminist ( talk) 15:47, 28 February 2019 (UTC) reply
• Looks to me like a lot's changed since the 2014 deletion. I'm going to go ahead and say that if an article with those sources came up at AfD, I would be in the "keep" camp.— S Marshall T/ C 14:06, 28 February 2019 (UTC) reply
• I'd support an unsalt if a good draft were proposed. Until then this is essentially moot. SportingFlyer T· C 20:49, 1 March 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Is the content currently at Draft:Plini not enough? feminist ( talk) 19:23, 2 March 2019 (UTC) reply
• Unsalt this hasn't been considered at AfD in five years and an experienced editor thinks a new version can demonstrate notability. The bar to unsalting should be low in that situation. Hut 8.5 20:25, 4 March 2019 (UTC) reply
• Unsalt. I don't know if the current Draft:Plini and the other sources noted in this AfD are enough to meet WP:N, but they're certainly good enough to support unsalting. If somebody brings it to AfD, that's the place to get into the quality of the sources. Actually, given our pathetically lax standards for contemporary musicians, I expect this would survive AfD. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:44, 5 March 2019 (UTC) reply