Ricardo Chará ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( XfD| restore)

Request Restore Ricardo Chará already made his professional debut (in although so far he played once) and according to WP:ATHLETE he fit the notability guideline now. Matthew_hk t c 14:20, 25 January 2011 (UTC) reply

The article quite clearly says he has played for Udinese since the last AfD. One short substitute appearance might not be enough to get the article through AfD again, but it would sure pass G4. However, can the substitute appearance be verified? The source cited says he was in the squad for the match. But the source does not say that he came onto the field. -- Mkativerata ( talk) 18:44, 25 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Pasotto, Marco (15 January 2010). "L' Udinese non c' è ancora ma si guadagna il Milan". La Gazzetta dello Sport (in Italian). Retrieved 26 January 2011. Matthew_hk t c 13:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC) reply

It looks like the admin who speedy deleted it recently has now restored it based on your request on his talk page. You probably should have given him more time to see your request there before starting this deletion review. Regardless, it seems that this deletion review is moot now. Calathan ( talk) 16:17, 26 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Rachel Starr ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( XfD| restore)

Speedy Restore. Passes WP:PORNBIO in receiving AVN Award nominations in multible years. First nomination: 2009 - Best Group Sex Scene Evil Angel nominees, Second Nomination: 2011 - Best Three-Way Sex Scene (G/G/B). She even has a Film called Rachel Starr Is Badass, which was nominated 2011 as Best Gonzo Release. On IMDB she is called Rochell Starr (I don´t know why), but it´s the same person, as you can see on the filmography.

So there´s nothing to debate, like in the case [ Kayla Carrera] she passes clearly the criteria and I will expand the old article. -- Hixteilchen ( talk) 06:39, 25 January 2011 (UTC) reply

• Comment - for christ's sake, can we please stop wasting DRVs time with this? At the time of the AfD, this person had ZERO notability demonstrated in the article. Now that she has grabbed onto the low-hanging fruit that is the criteria WP:PORNBIO, she seems to satisfy it. Just remake the article with sources to support the new info, it will be sufficiently different from the individual to invalidate a speedy delete claim. If someone decides to challenge it with a 2nd AfD, then defend it there. Tarc ( talk) 13:54, 25 January 2011 (UTC) reply
• Comment - No, we can´t. -- Hixteilchen ( talk) 14:30, 25 January 2011 (UTC) reply
• Speedy close-A valid article has already been (correctly) created, so there's really no point in proceeding with this DRV. It is, as Tarc said, simply a waste of time.-- Fyre2387 ^{( talk • contribs)} 18:22, 25 January 2011 (UTC) reply