reason: Posed as a conflict of interest. Have read the
WP:COI page. I will state my intentions on my user page with the new username. 20:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Hleetranspo (
talk •
contribs)
When will my request be looked at?
Hleetranspo (
talk) 14:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: Please confirm you have read
WP:COI. Please also confirm you understand that this applies regardless of username. Please confirm you have saved the information in your userspace about your company so that I can delete it from there. Please confirm you will not recreate it on Wikipedia, further to
WP:COI. --
Dweller (
talk) 18:02, 18 November 2009 (UTC)reply
I have read
WP:COI, and i understand it applies regardless of my username. I was planning on uploading my page after I worked on it further. I can't upload my page even if I state my intentions/affiliations on my user page?
Bureaucrat note: Your reply suggests you still have not read
WP:COI properly. You are restricted to
Wikipedia:COI#Non-controversial_edits, which does not include creating an article. --
Dweller (
talk) 11:22, 24 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:21, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: please, change my username because of my workplace.
109.188.23.241 (
talk) 14:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Please log in to file a request. –Juliancolton |
Talk 14:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: The username appears to be promotional. Use of a company, organization, group, website, or product name as a username is prohibited by
the username policy. Please choose another name. —
Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!)What I Do / What I Say 04:54, 22 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:35, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: avoid use of real name
Jenscheid (
talk) 15:22, 20 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: The requested username is already registered; see Special:CentralAuth. However, as this requested account has made no edits, it meets the criteria for being usurped; if you are an established user and wish to usurp it, please read and follow the process at
m:Steward requests/Username changes. If you do not wish to usurp the username, please choose another name to be renamed to.
The Rambling Man (
talk) 16:09, 20 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: More appropriate. Hollis 22:21, 21 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Hollisrules (
talk •
contribs)
Bureaucrat note: Are you aware of (and comfortable with) the potential implications associated with
using a real name?
The Rambling Man (
talk) 22:25, 21 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:37, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I am actually the publicist for DjPaq and would like the username to be something easier to remember when him or one of his associates tries to add things to the account. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Moonmedia1 (
talk •
contribs) 16:24, 22 November 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 17:32, 22 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Please be aware of our
COI guidelines. –Juliancolton |
Talk 17:38, 22 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Furthermore, the account should not be used by DjPaq or another of his associates - only you. The general rule is
one person to an account. AJCham 17:46, 22 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: There is an (almost) duplicate request
here. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 05:26, 26 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:41, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: 1. Please provide a reason for your request to rename. 2. Are you aware with (and comfortable) with the potential implications that may come with the use of a
real name as your username? —
Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!)What I Do / What I Say 22:16, 22 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:42, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I just want to make unified account (with username Ujjwol) as I have that username in Wiktionary.
113.199.176.63 (
talk) 08:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits; Request was made by ip 113.199.176.63, instead of the original account.
SoxBot (
talk) 08:09, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done. Please log in as Ujjwol Lamichhane, go to
WP:CHU/SUL, and file a request per the instructions there. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:35, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: 3 change from a generic name to a more specific one. I am aware of using names on Wikipedia and I am comfortable with that.
IRAL0001 (
talk) 17:40, 23 November 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 17:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Robot clerk note: The requested username is already registered; see Special:Listusers. However, as this requested account has made no edits, it meets the criteria for being usurped; if you wish to usurp it, please read and follow the process at
Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations. If you do not wish to usurp the username, please choose another name to be renamed to. --
Chris G Bot 3 (
talk) 18:05, 23 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: My username was blocked when created 3 years ago- before I could start editing/creating articles for unknown reasons, I would simply like an unblocked username so I could utilize and contribute to the site.
192.211.25.131 (
talk) 08:48, 27 November 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Request was made by ip 192.211.25.131, instead of the original account; Old username is currently blocked.
SoxBot (
talk) 08:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: First you'll have to log in to your present account and request unblock to change your username. Then, logged in, come here and make this request. Or, alternatively, just abandon "Poopookachoo" and create a new user name.
@Kate(talk) 08:53, 27 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No need for an unblock and a rename as there are no edits. Just ignore this old account and create a new one. Welcome (back) to Wikipedia! --
Dweller (
talk) 10:42, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: prefer this name! :)
Rtrott (
talk) 07:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Being that this is your only edit, you really have no reason to be renamed. Why don't you simply abandon this account and create the one that you would prefer?
@Kate(talk) 07:59, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Old username has only one edit. Please just create the new account and abandon this one. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 04:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: accidental submission of username which is not appropriate
Mdg190503 (
talk) 00:05, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 00:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: The target name exits, though it meets the criteria for
usurpation. Sadly, your account is too new to usurp an account. Please select another name.
@Kate(talk) 03:31, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Reason for requested rename.
Gjjesse (
talk) 17:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)}}reply
Clerk note: Moved from the usurp page; target name does not exist
Triplestopx3 23:32, 24 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Re-formatted from
WP:CHU/U. Additionally, are you aware of (and comfortable with) the potential implications associated with using a
real name?
@Kate(talk) 02:51, 25 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Done retroactively -- user is already using a real name. Andre (
talk) 02:24, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: It's the name I go by online. :3
Dawsgah (
talk) 08:19, 27 November 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits; Target account conflicts with SUL.
SoxBot (
talk) 08:21, 27 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: I would be willing to consider a usurp request under these circumstances favourably, but the user does not seem to be editing any longer. If a clerk would like to follow-up at usertalk/email and find out if they've left or are using another username, I'd be grateful. --
Dweller (
talk) 10:40, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: I've left him a note on his talk page as he does not have email enabled.
@Kate(talk) 10:45, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
I just realized I made the account Dr Pichu. I musta forgotten it about it.
Dawsgah (
talk) 03:21, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done User has both names, and neither has many edits. No need for a rename. Enjoy. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 15:58, 27 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: I'm one of the more conservative Crats, so I hesitate here. I'm worried about the new username offending people/relatives of people with mental health problems. I welcome input from other Crats, even (especially) if you disagree with me. --
Dweller (
talk) 17:12, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: I don't think it would be offensive (perhaps so if it was "ARetardedDude" or similar). I think this would be an acceptable username. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 03:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: I wonder if this is ENGVAR again? I'd perceive "retarded" and "demented" with exactly the same level of obnoxiousness if, say, thrown at me as an insult. --
Dweller (
talk) 10:43, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: Possibly. I wouldn't perceive them in the same way. "Demented" can have a humorous "you must be crazy" implication. "Retarded" is generally considered rude no matter how it's used. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 16:53, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Nihonjoe's helped persuade me, that as I'd view demented as egregiously as retarded and he'd find retarded offensive, this is a potentially offensive username, per
WP:ENGVAR. This is an international encyclopedia. Please find a name that shouldn't cause offense to an international audience. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:13, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: My name is Voll, and this was sort of my nickname. But if it's against wiki policy, Voll would be fine.
Vollidiot (
talk) 21:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 21:24, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done A user on ruwiki has made 100 contributions under "Voll", so it wouldn't be right to interfere with his
global claim to the username. I don't really see a problem with Vollidiot, especially since it doesn't particularly stand out. I think you'd be fine just to keep with it. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:04, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I would like to make all the websites I access have the same username.
Ncmason (
talk) 02:09, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 02:12, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Your contributions history entirely consists of vandalism. When you begin to contribute constructively, the privilege of a rename will be open to you. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:11, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Wikipedia said my old username was profane, I hope this one is more acceptable.
HolyCrapImFat (
talk) 22:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 22:09, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done. I'm assuming that the objection to your username was due to potential offence to overweight people, in which case I don't think removing the word "crap" helps... WJBscribe(talk) 01:17, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Seriously? I don't really think either of these is offensive. Andre (
talk) 02:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: We have been recommended a change of username as our current name sounds too much like a company.
Chelmsford Theatres (
talk) 09:15, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 09:15, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done I am inferring from your use of "we" that a collective is operating this account (or, at least, that one person is operating the account in the capacity of a collective). Wikipedia accounts are for use by one person only, and group editing –
especially from an organisation or company – is not tolerated. Per
Wikipedia:Account_deletion#Sharing_accounts, I have softblocked the account. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:15, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: The name should be 2 words
Mosscircle (
talk) 13:37, 28 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Formatted malformed request. Additionally do you want the 'c' in 'circle' to be capitalized (producing 'Moss Circle')?
@Kate(talk) 13:39, 28 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply, not editing. --
Dweller (
talk) 12:38, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Own name originally used - want to avoid harrassment
Barnypearce (
talk) 16:33, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 16:36, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Given that your only edit is to this project page, perhaps it would be more efficient to simply discard the old account and resume participation under the desired name? –Juliancolton |
Talk 00:53, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Per clerk. --
Dweller (
talk) 12:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Used name of art patron and blog unknowingly, changing username to general coded login
Timtaylorgallery (
talk) 10:24, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: Are you personally closely associated with the Tim Taylor Gallery? --
Dweller (
talk) 10:35, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Here's what I don't understand. If a user's name is inappropriate, you ask them if they're not going to violate COI, and then if they don't respond, you don't change their name. Then they come back in a month or a year and they still have an inappropriate username which might get them blocked on sight. Why not change the name and follow up about the COI as a separate issue? If anything, this kind of rename will reduce the self-promotion. Andre (
talk) 18:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Renaming is courtesy service provided to good-faith, constructive editors. If a user intends to continue promoting their company, despite warnings and perhaps even blocks, they're no longer necessarily in good-standing, and thus we don't have to carry out the rename. Therefore I think Dweller's concerns on COI and spam are valid. –Juliancolton |
Talk 18:54, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 12:44, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I know whyI was blocked. and understand the correct wiki posting structure and purpose of my Talk Page
64.60.136.2 (
talk) 19:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 19:42, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: All requests must be made while logged in to the account that will be renamed; this request was made by
64.60.136.2 (
talk·contribs). Please log in to the account that is to be renamed and confirm this request. –Juliancolton |
Talk 21:58, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: My current username is of my real name. Which, for me, is not at all that of an issue. My problem is that the current username is too long for me. And also that i prefer not to disclose my surname.
Rehman (
talk) 12:22, 8 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 12:24, 8 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Could the above SoxBot error be because of me having a unified account? Because, there is absolutely no user by the name of Rehman.
Rehman (
talk) 12:31, 8 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done. SoxBot is correct, there is user by the name of Rehman
[2]. However, as that account has made no edits, you can make a request at
WP:CHU/U to take over the name. WJBscribe(talk) 13:29, 8 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Thank you for your time. I have listed this request at
WP:CHU/U. Best regards.
Rehman (
talk) 14:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I am aware with the personal implications of using a real name. I also wish myself to be associated with my family, as they have requested me for a Wikipedia account. And I want myself to be easily recognized at school.Boeing7107isdelicious|
SPRiCh miT meineN PiloteN 12:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 12:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: Hello, what do you mean by "they have requested me for a Wikipedia account"? --
Dweller (
talk) 16:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
That isn't what Dweller means. Your wording's a bit odd and difficult to understand. Could you explain? -Jeremy(
v^_^vStop... at a WHAMMY!!) 03:20, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
I certainly can't say whether I'm right, but I read it as "I want to be associated with my family's name, a suggestion they came up with for my Wikipedia account."
Useight (
talk) 04:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
There is currently a thread on ANI (currently
here, though it might be archived soon) relating to this user. -- SoapTalk/Contributions 04:39, 5 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: somebody else used my account, this also my username for a number of soacial networking sites
Paullywaully88 (
talk) 22:48, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 22:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: Please explain what you mean by "somebody else used my account". —Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 11:56, 9 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I wanted to use my real name and create a page on Tony T Nguyen
Tonytmusic (
talk) 08:58, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 09:00, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: Please see
WP:COI. Autobiographies on the English Wikipedia are strongly discouraged, as it is almost impossible for a person to write
neutrally about themselves. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 09:26, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I would like my wikipedia user name to be exactly equal to my real name
216.165.32.144 (
talk) 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Request was made by ip 216.165.32.144, instead of the original account.
SoxBot (
talk) 07:15, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Please log in before making a request here. NB It'll save time if you read
WP:REALNAME and confirm you're happy with it when you make the request. --
Dweller (
talk) 09:30, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: changing to a simpler username, unifying all other usernames that i use
67.250.53.240 (
talk) 06:20, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits; Request was made by ip 67.250.53.240, instead of the original account.
SoxBot (
talk) 06:21, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done You have made five requests. Please make up your mind. When you do, please log in and place a final request. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: more privacy, previous suggested username unavaible, unifying all usernames.
67.250.53.240 (
talk) 06:23, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Request was made by ip 67.250.53.240, instead of the original account.
SoxBot (
talk) 06:24, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done You have made five requests. Please make up your mind. When you do, please log in and place a final request. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Request was made by ip 67.250.53.240, instead of the original account.
SoxBot (
talk) 06:33, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done You have made five requests. Please make up your mind. When you do, please log in and place a final request. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: need to change for privacy purposes
Mobiusdanceryzer (
talk) 06:37, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 06:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done You have made five requests. Please make up your mind. When you do, please log in and place a final request. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason:
1Steelhead2 (
talk) 18:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Current name is confusing to readers desiring access to the donation.reply
I've reformatted this request, as it was malformed, but you could please confirm that Paul H. Ford Jr. is the correct desired name? –Juliancolton |
Talk 18:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Could you please clarify your rationale? It doesn't make much sense what-so-ever. -Jeremy(
v^_^vStop... at a WHAMMY!!) 23:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 13:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Don't want it to say "User" anymore
Amanda Griffin (
talk) 15:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bad request.
User:XLOC is a non-existent user. You pushed
User:Amanda Griffin/XLOC to
User:XLOC, when you should have pushed it to
XLOC. I've marked
User:XLOC with {{
db-u2}} because it's a non-existent user and therefore candidate for speedy deletion. More on your talk page, as the additional commentary is not relevant here. --
Hammersoft (
talk) 15:53, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Mistaken request. --
Dweller (
talk) 16:37, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
CURRENT → NEW
Please fill out this template correctly, replacing CURRENT with your current username.
Please fill out this template correctly, replacing NEW with your requested username.
please delete me (zachariastongue) as user - thank you
reason - was not ever content to be a user in the first place. came under external pressure
thank you most kindly
Clerk note: Sorry, but user accounts cannot be deleted, only renamed. You only have three edits, perhaps simply logging out permanently would be the best solution.
Useight (
talk) 13:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Can't delete account; no new account name given. MBisanztalk 23:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Malformed request fixed. Usernames are case-sensitive; your username is not
JUSTICEBOT (
talk·contribs) but
JusticeBot (
talk·contribs). Do you wish your target username in camel case as well? (perhaps moot, as it still ends in bot)
Intelligentsium 00:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
My understanding is that names ending in -bot are allowed if there's no reasonable chance of confusion arising that the account is actually a bot. I seem to remember someone whose real name was "Sabot" or something similar being allowed to use it in their username, for example. -- SoapTalk/Contributions 04:10, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
This guy's real name is not Justice Robot. The name should be rejected. Abductive (
reasoning) 13:36, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Yeh; I'm gonna have to agree with Abductive and Intelligentsium. The requested name still violates username policy (since it still makes it resemble an automated account); I'd advise you choose a different name. -Jeremy(
v^_^vStop... at a WHAMMY!!) 07:36, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done. Usernames ending in "bot" or "robot" should be used for automated accounts. WJBscribe(talk) 13:45, 17 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 18:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: The username appears to be promotional. Use of a company, organization, group, website, or product name as a username is prohibited by
the username policy. Please choose another name.
@Kate(parlez) 18:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Requesting user blocked.
@Kate(parlez) 19:07, 13 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I do not want initial caps on my username. Is this possible? Thanks!
Eerway (
talk) 21:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits; Target account conflicts with SUL.
SoxBot (
talk) 22:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: The requested username is the same as your current name, aside from the first letter being in lowercase. Due to technical limitations, usernames must start with an uppercase letter. However, you may use the template {{
lowercase title}} on your user and user talk pages, and change your signature to reflect your preference.
@Kate(parlez) 22:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done. All username start with a capital letter. WJBscribe(talk) 13:46, 17 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: This is a shortened version of my name, phonetically, and a lot less to type each time. (sorry, I'll put it on the correct page... sorry about that.)
OiseauTemp (
talk) 08:31, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 08:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Request was made by ip 109.93.206.120, instead of the original account.
SoxBot (
talk) 19:48, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done - please make the request while signed in to the account that is to be renamed. WJBscribe(talk) 13:49, 17 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I was being abused beacause of it
212.219.249.6 (
talk) 14:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Request was made by ip 212.219.249.6, instead of the original account.
SoxBot (
talk) 14:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done - please make the request while signed in to the account that is to be renamed. WJBscribe(talk) 13:49, 17 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Using this new name on all foruns to avoid spam in the old username(same as my email so i get too much spam)
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 22:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
==== Master Templar ==== 15:52, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 15:54, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Could you please file another correctly formatted request? Thanks. –Juliancolton |
Talk 03:18, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I receive too much spam in my email account wich have the same username as wikipedia therefore i wish to change my username here
Rodrigodc01 (
talk) 10:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 10:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Your rename has already happened. Log out and log in as User:Jedi_Master_Yavin4. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 12:17, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 18:36, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Your target username seems to stand for "Webteam The Children's Hospital", which implies that a group is editing this account. This is prohibited by
WP:NOSHARE. I have softblocked the account. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 23:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: Your RiverBendAcademy account has a
unified login, though you only have one edit on Commons and no edits on Meta (see
here). Are you fine with being renamed just on this wiki, which will detach this account from your global account? ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 02:51, 10 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: harassment due fact that I am a police officer
Ericbonetti (
talk) 23:05, 9 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 23:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: As SoxBot was kind enough to inform you of, this account already exists, though it meets the criteria for
usurpation. However, due to the reason behind your request you might not wish to wait the 7 days that it takes for an usurpation to be carried out. Is there another name, not listed at
Special:ListUsers, that you would prefer?
@Kate(parlez) 23:11, 9 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I like this one better for discussion purposes Ed Hawryliw Culinary Artist 19:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 19:42, 10 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Seems a tad promotional to me, but I would like to hear other clerk's and bureaucrat opinions.
@Kate(parlez) 00:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done looks too all intents to be promotional, plus the requesting user has made no attempt to convince us otherwise.
The Rambling Man (
talk) 16:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits; Target account conflicts with SUL.
SoxBot (
talk) 10:18, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: The current name can be considered offensive under some circumstances, and additionally there are some personal reasons that led up to this decision.
Sepp18 (
talk) 09:35, 20 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 09:36, 20 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: We are the same person.
Higor Douglas (
talk) 02:12, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 02:16, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Please note that merging two accounts is technically impossible. You can simply stop using "Higordouglas" and only edit using "Higor Douglas" from now on (and add a link to
User:Higordouglas to your userpage) instead. Regards SoWhy 08:01, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Accounts can't be merged. As SoWhy mentioned, simply redirect or link to the Higor Douglas userpages from the Higordouglas userpages. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 22:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: The username appears to be promotional. Use of a company, organization, group, website, or product name as a username is prohibited by
the username policy. Please choose another name. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 15:32, 17 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Incorrectly put in wrong username
Ukip sheffield (
talk) 14:23, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 14:24, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: The username
Ukip sheffield (
talk·contribs) has made no contributions to the project aside from this edit, or has only a few minor contributions.. Please just create the new account and begin using that one instead of the current account. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 05:23, 19 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I thought I shouldn't seperate the word like standard username proceedure.
Wildernesscrossing (
talk) 00:17, 22 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 00:18, 22 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: The username appears to be promotional. Use of a company, organization, group, website, or product name as a username is prohibited by
the username policy. Please choose another name. ("Wilderness Crossing is a northern Michigan Family Entertainment Center located in Traverse City," as you
wrote on your userpage.) ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 02:33, 22 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Requesting user now blocked. –Juliancolton |
Talk 17:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Can resubmit if they wish to be unblocked. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 04:26, 24 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Not Allowed Company Names. There was a concern of multiple users accessing Wikipedia, but Wikipedia will only be accessed by one person
KulturFilms (
talk) 23:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 23:03, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: The username appears to be promotional. Use of a company, organization, group, website, or product name as a username is prohibited by
the username policy. Please choose another name. It seems that the username is now intended to be something similar to "Graphics Department". Could still be considered inappropriate. —
Duncan (that's me!)What I Do / What I Say 13:42, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: Please provide a reason for your request. I'm not sure how I feel about the target username; it looks more like a user class than a username, a characteristic which is usually discouraged. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:20, 17 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: want name to be all lowercase Anita De Monte 15:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 15:43, 23 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: The requested username is the same as your current name, aside from the first letter being in lowercase. Due to technical limitations, usernames must start with an uppercase letter. However, you may use the template {{
lowercase title}} on your user and user talk pages, and change your signature to reflect your preference. SoWhy 22:41, 23 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: My account is blocked.
KulturFilms (
talk) 14:35, 23 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done "Current" username does not match the requestor's username. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 22:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC)reply
I'm sorry, the current is KulturFilms. should I send a new request? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
KulturFilms (
talk •
contribs) 15:33, 24 December 2009 (UTC)reply
You apparently did submit a new request one minute after asking this question. Further responses will be there. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 21:21, 24 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Reason for requested renaming.
99.39.149.251 (
talk) 18:44, 24 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Request was made by ip 99.39.149.251, instead of the original account; Old username is currently blocked.
SoxBot (
talk) 18:45, 24 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done The chosen replacement username appears to be just as promotional as the original. Use of a company name as a username is prohibited by
the username policy. Additionally, the request was not made by
Nanyangco. Please follow the directions on your talk page in order to be unblocked. The username you select must not be promotional. Thank you. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 21:15, 24 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 14:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: - the rename is technically possible and we take all privacy requests very seriously, but I do note that you have made a considerable number of edits to an article about yourself. Are you aware of editing within
WP:COI?
The Rambling Man (
talk) 16:54, 19 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I would prefer a different username
Rishko (
talk) 15:34, 19 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 15:36, 19 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: I see you were blocked last year for "image violations". You took a long break then came back, uploading images again. Can you confirm that you will be providing correct rationales for the images you upload and this rename is not simply an opportunity to avoid scrutiny as a once-blocked editor?
The Rambling Man (
talk) 17:00, 19 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 01:09, 20 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: This is a repeat request. Please read the question at the original request and respond accordingly. Cheers.
The Rambling Man (
talk) 01:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 21:20, 27 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits; Target account conflicts with SUL.
SoxBot (
talk) 14:18, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: As SoxBot told you, the target username exists, though it meets the criteria for
usurpation. However, your account is too new to usurp another one. In order to ensure that usurped usernames be put to good use, we prefer only to grant requests from reasonably well-established users. Is there another name, not listed at
Special:ListUsers, that you would prefer?
@Kate(parlez) 17:27, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Is it possible that Judwa.nayak is him too and he just forgot his password? Both names were registered on the same day, so it would be a pretty big coincidence if they were different people. -- SoapTalk/Contributions 21:17, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: It'd be good if we could get this clarified. I wonder if a clerk could chase up the various accounts? --
Dweller (
talk) 10:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Katerenka notified them on December 12; no response AFAIK. –Juliancolton |
Talk 05:10, 29 December 2009 (UTC)reply
reason: Posed as a conflict of interest. Have read the
WP:COI page. I will state my intentions on my user page with the new username. 20:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Hleetranspo (
talk •
contribs)
When will my request be looked at?
Hleetranspo (
talk) 14:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: Please confirm you have read
WP:COI. Please also confirm you understand that this applies regardless of username. Please confirm you have saved the information in your userspace about your company so that I can delete it from there. Please confirm you will not recreate it on Wikipedia, further to
WP:COI. --
Dweller (
talk) 18:02, 18 November 2009 (UTC)reply
I have read
WP:COI, and i understand it applies regardless of my username. I was planning on uploading my page after I worked on it further. I can't upload my page even if I state my intentions/affiliations on my user page?
Bureaucrat note: Your reply suggests you still have not read
WP:COI properly. You are restricted to
Wikipedia:COI#Non-controversial_edits, which does not include creating an article. --
Dweller (
talk) 11:22, 24 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:21, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: please, change my username because of my workplace.
109.188.23.241 (
talk) 14:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Please log in to file a request. –Juliancolton |
Talk 14:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: The username appears to be promotional. Use of a company, organization, group, website, or product name as a username is prohibited by
the username policy. Please choose another name. —
Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!)What I Do / What I Say 04:54, 22 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:35, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: avoid use of real name
Jenscheid (
talk) 15:22, 20 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: The requested username is already registered; see Special:CentralAuth. However, as this requested account has made no edits, it meets the criteria for being usurped; if you are an established user and wish to usurp it, please read and follow the process at
m:Steward requests/Username changes. If you do not wish to usurp the username, please choose another name to be renamed to.
The Rambling Man (
talk) 16:09, 20 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: More appropriate. Hollis 22:21, 21 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Hollisrules (
talk •
contribs)
Bureaucrat note: Are you aware of (and comfortable with) the potential implications associated with
using a real name?
The Rambling Man (
talk) 22:25, 21 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:37, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I am actually the publicist for DjPaq and would like the username to be something easier to remember when him or one of his associates tries to add things to the account. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Moonmedia1 (
talk •
contribs) 16:24, 22 November 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 17:32, 22 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Please be aware of our
COI guidelines. –Juliancolton |
Talk 17:38, 22 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Furthermore, the account should not be used by DjPaq or another of his associates - only you. The general rule is
one person to an account. AJCham 17:46, 22 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: There is an (almost) duplicate request
here. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 05:26, 26 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:41, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: 1. Please provide a reason for your request to rename. 2. Are you aware with (and comfortable) with the potential implications that may come with the use of a
real name as your username? —
Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!)What I Do / What I Say 22:16, 22 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:42, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I just want to make unified account (with username Ujjwol) as I have that username in Wiktionary.
113.199.176.63 (
talk) 08:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits; Request was made by ip 113.199.176.63, instead of the original account.
SoxBot (
talk) 08:09, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done. Please log in as Ujjwol Lamichhane, go to
WP:CHU/SUL, and file a request per the instructions there. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:35, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: 3 change from a generic name to a more specific one. I am aware of using names on Wikipedia and I am comfortable with that.
IRAL0001 (
talk) 17:40, 23 November 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 17:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Robot clerk note: The requested username is already registered; see Special:Listusers. However, as this requested account has made no edits, it meets the criteria for being usurped; if you wish to usurp it, please read and follow the process at
Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations. If you do not wish to usurp the username, please choose another name to be renamed to. --
Chris G Bot 3 (
talk) 18:05, 23 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: My username was blocked when created 3 years ago- before I could start editing/creating articles for unknown reasons, I would simply like an unblocked username so I could utilize and contribute to the site.
192.211.25.131 (
talk) 08:48, 27 November 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Request was made by ip 192.211.25.131, instead of the original account; Old username is currently blocked.
SoxBot (
talk) 08:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: First you'll have to log in to your present account and request unblock to change your username. Then, logged in, come here and make this request. Or, alternatively, just abandon "Poopookachoo" and create a new user name.
@Kate(talk) 08:53, 27 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No need for an unblock and a rename as there are no edits. Just ignore this old account and create a new one. Welcome (back) to Wikipedia! --
Dweller (
talk) 10:42, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: prefer this name! :)
Rtrott (
talk) 07:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Being that this is your only edit, you really have no reason to be renamed. Why don't you simply abandon this account and create the one that you would prefer?
@Kate(talk) 07:59, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Old username has only one edit. Please just create the new account and abandon this one. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 04:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: accidental submission of username which is not appropriate
Mdg190503 (
talk) 00:05, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 00:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: The target name exits, though it meets the criteria for
usurpation. Sadly, your account is too new to usurp an account. Please select another name.
@Kate(talk) 03:31, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Reason for requested rename.
Gjjesse (
talk) 17:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)}}reply
Clerk note: Moved from the usurp page; target name does not exist
Triplestopx3 23:32, 24 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Re-formatted from
WP:CHU/U. Additionally, are you aware of (and comfortable with) the potential implications associated with using a
real name?
@Kate(talk) 02:51, 25 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Done retroactively -- user is already using a real name. Andre (
talk) 02:24, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: It's the name I go by online. :3
Dawsgah (
talk) 08:19, 27 November 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits; Target account conflicts with SUL.
SoxBot (
talk) 08:21, 27 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: I would be willing to consider a usurp request under these circumstances favourably, but the user does not seem to be editing any longer. If a clerk would like to follow-up at usertalk/email and find out if they've left or are using another username, I'd be grateful. --
Dweller (
talk) 10:40, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: I've left him a note on his talk page as he does not have email enabled.
@Kate(talk) 10:45, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
I just realized I made the account Dr Pichu. I musta forgotten it about it.
Dawsgah (
talk) 03:21, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done User has both names, and neither has many edits. No need for a rename. Enjoy. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 15:58, 27 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: I'm one of the more conservative Crats, so I hesitate here. I'm worried about the new username offending people/relatives of people with mental health problems. I welcome input from other Crats, even (especially) if you disagree with me. --
Dweller (
talk) 17:12, 29 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: I don't think it would be offensive (perhaps so if it was "ARetardedDude" or similar). I think this would be an acceptable username. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 03:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: I wonder if this is ENGVAR again? I'd perceive "retarded" and "demented" with exactly the same level of obnoxiousness if, say, thrown at me as an insult. --
Dweller (
talk) 10:43, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: Possibly. I wouldn't perceive them in the same way. "Demented" can have a humorous "you must be crazy" implication. "Retarded" is generally considered rude no matter how it's used. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 16:53, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Nihonjoe's helped persuade me, that as I'd view demented as egregiously as retarded and he'd find retarded offensive, this is a potentially offensive username, per
WP:ENGVAR. This is an international encyclopedia. Please find a name that shouldn't cause offense to an international audience. --
Dweller (
talk) 14:13, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: My name is Voll, and this was sort of my nickname. But if it's against wiki policy, Voll would be fine.
Vollidiot (
talk) 21:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 21:24, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done A user on ruwiki has made 100 contributions under "Voll", so it wouldn't be right to interfere with his
global claim to the username. I don't really see a problem with Vollidiot, especially since it doesn't particularly stand out. I think you'd be fine just to keep with it. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:04, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I would like to make all the websites I access have the same username.
Ncmason (
talk) 02:09, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 02:12, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Your contributions history entirely consists of vandalism. When you begin to contribute constructively, the privilege of a rename will be open to you. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:11, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Wikipedia said my old username was profane, I hope this one is more acceptable.
HolyCrapImFat (
talk) 22:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 22:09, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done. I'm assuming that the objection to your username was due to potential offence to overweight people, in which case I don't think removing the word "crap" helps... WJBscribe(talk) 01:17, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Seriously? I don't really think either of these is offensive. Andre (
talk) 02:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: We have been recommended a change of username as our current name sounds too much like a company.
Chelmsford Theatres (
talk) 09:15, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 09:15, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done I am inferring from your use of "we" that a collective is operating this account (or, at least, that one person is operating the account in the capacity of a collective). Wikipedia accounts are for use by one person only, and group editing –
especially from an organisation or company – is not tolerated. Per
Wikipedia:Account_deletion#Sharing_accounts, I have softblocked the account. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:15, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: The name should be 2 words
Mosscircle (
talk) 13:37, 28 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Formatted malformed request. Additionally do you want the 'c' in 'circle' to be capitalized (producing 'Moss Circle')?
@Kate(talk) 13:39, 28 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply, not editing. --
Dweller (
talk) 12:38, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Own name originally used - want to avoid harrassment
Barnypearce (
talk) 16:33, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 16:36, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Given that your only edit is to this project page, perhaps it would be more efficient to simply discard the old account and resume participation under the desired name? –Juliancolton |
Talk 00:53, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Per clerk. --
Dweller (
talk) 12:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Used name of art patron and blog unknowingly, changing username to general coded login
Timtaylorgallery (
talk) 10:24, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: Are you personally closely associated with the Tim Taylor Gallery? --
Dweller (
talk) 10:35, 30 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Here's what I don't understand. If a user's name is inappropriate, you ask them if they're not going to violate COI, and then if they don't respond, you don't change their name. Then they come back in a month or a year and they still have an inappropriate username which might get them blocked on sight. Why not change the name and follow up about the COI as a separate issue? If anything, this kind of rename will reduce the self-promotion. Andre (
talk) 18:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Renaming is courtesy service provided to good-faith, constructive editors. If a user intends to continue promoting their company, despite warnings and perhaps even blocks, they're no longer necessarily in good-standing, and thus we don't have to carry out the rename. Therefore I think Dweller's concerns on COI and spam are valid. –Juliancolton |
Talk 18:54, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 12:44, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I know whyI was blocked. and understand the correct wiki posting structure and purpose of my Talk Page
64.60.136.2 (
talk) 19:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 19:42, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: All requests must be made while logged in to the account that will be renamed; this request was made by
64.60.136.2 (
talk·contribs). Please log in to the account that is to be renamed and confirm this request. –Juliancolton |
Talk 21:58, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: My current username is of my real name. Which, for me, is not at all that of an issue. My problem is that the current username is too long for me. And also that i prefer not to disclose my surname.
Rehman (
talk) 12:22, 8 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 12:24, 8 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Could the above SoxBot error be because of me having a unified account? Because, there is absolutely no user by the name of Rehman.
Rehman (
talk) 12:31, 8 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done. SoxBot is correct, there is user by the name of Rehman
[2]. However, as that account has made no edits, you can make a request at
WP:CHU/U to take over the name. WJBscribe(talk) 13:29, 8 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Thank you for your time. I have listed this request at
WP:CHU/U. Best regards.
Rehman (
talk) 14:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I am aware with the personal implications of using a real name. I also wish myself to be associated with my family, as they have requested me for a Wikipedia account. And I want myself to be easily recognized at school.Boeing7107isdelicious|
SPRiCh miT meineN PiloteN 12:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 12:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: Hello, what do you mean by "they have requested me for a Wikipedia account"? --
Dweller (
talk) 16:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
That isn't what Dweller means. Your wording's a bit odd and difficult to understand. Could you explain? -Jeremy(
v^_^vStop... at a WHAMMY!!) 03:20, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
I certainly can't say whether I'm right, but I read it as "I want to be associated with my family's name, a suggestion they came up with for my Wikipedia account."
Useight (
talk) 04:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
There is currently a thread on ANI (currently
here, though it might be archived soon) relating to this user. -- SoapTalk/Contributions 04:39, 5 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: somebody else used my account, this also my username for a number of soacial networking sites
Paullywaully88 (
talk) 22:48, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 22:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: Please explain what you mean by "somebody else used my account". —Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 11:56, 9 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I wanted to use my real name and create a page on Tony T Nguyen
Tonytmusic (
talk) 08:58, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 09:00, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: Please see
WP:COI. Autobiographies on the English Wikipedia are strongly discouraged, as it is almost impossible for a person to write
neutrally about themselves. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 09:26, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I would like my wikipedia user name to be exactly equal to my real name
216.165.32.144 (
talk) 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Request was made by ip 216.165.32.144, instead of the original account.
SoxBot (
talk) 07:15, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Please log in before making a request here. NB It'll save time if you read
WP:REALNAME and confirm you're happy with it when you make the request. --
Dweller (
talk) 09:30, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: changing to a simpler username, unifying all other usernames that i use
67.250.53.240 (
talk) 06:20, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits; Request was made by ip 67.250.53.240, instead of the original account.
SoxBot (
talk) 06:21, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done You have made five requests. Please make up your mind. When you do, please log in and place a final request. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: more privacy, previous suggested username unavaible, unifying all usernames.
67.250.53.240 (
talk) 06:23, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Request was made by ip 67.250.53.240, instead of the original account.
SoxBot (
talk) 06:24, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done You have made five requests. Please make up your mind. When you do, please log in and place a final request. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Request was made by ip 67.250.53.240, instead of the original account.
SoxBot (
talk) 06:33, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done You have made five requests. Please make up your mind. When you do, please log in and place a final request. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: need to change for privacy purposes
Mobiusdanceryzer (
talk) 06:37, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 06:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done You have made five requests. Please make up your mind. When you do, please log in and place a final request. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason:
1Steelhead2 (
talk) 18:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Current name is confusing to readers desiring access to the donation.reply
I've reformatted this request, as it was malformed, but you could please confirm that Paul H. Ford Jr. is the correct desired name? –Juliancolton |
Talk 18:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Could you please clarify your rationale? It doesn't make much sense what-so-ever. -Jeremy(
v^_^vStop... at a WHAMMY!!) 23:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 13:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Don't want it to say "User" anymore
Amanda Griffin (
talk) 15:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bad request.
User:XLOC is a non-existent user. You pushed
User:Amanda Griffin/XLOC to
User:XLOC, when you should have pushed it to
XLOC. I've marked
User:XLOC with {{
db-u2}} because it's a non-existent user and therefore candidate for speedy deletion. More on your talk page, as the additional commentary is not relevant here. --
Hammersoft (
talk) 15:53, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Mistaken request. --
Dweller (
talk) 16:37, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
CURRENT → NEW
Please fill out this template correctly, replacing CURRENT with your current username.
Please fill out this template correctly, replacing NEW with your requested username.
please delete me (zachariastongue) as user - thank you
reason - was not ever content to be a user in the first place. came under external pressure
thank you most kindly
Clerk note: Sorry, but user accounts cannot be deleted, only renamed. You only have three edits, perhaps simply logging out permanently would be the best solution.
Useight (
talk) 13:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Can't delete account; no new account name given. MBisanztalk 23:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Malformed request fixed. Usernames are case-sensitive; your username is not
JUSTICEBOT (
talk·contribs) but
JusticeBot (
talk·contribs). Do you wish your target username in camel case as well? (perhaps moot, as it still ends in bot)
Intelligentsium 00:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
My understanding is that names ending in -bot are allowed if there's no reasonable chance of confusion arising that the account is actually a bot. I seem to remember someone whose real name was "Sabot" or something similar being allowed to use it in their username, for example. -- SoapTalk/Contributions 04:10, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
This guy's real name is not Justice Robot. The name should be rejected. Abductive (
reasoning) 13:36, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Yeh; I'm gonna have to agree with Abductive and Intelligentsium. The requested name still violates username policy (since it still makes it resemble an automated account); I'd advise you choose a different name. -Jeremy(
v^_^vStop... at a WHAMMY!!) 07:36, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done. Usernames ending in "bot" or "robot" should be used for automated accounts. WJBscribe(talk) 13:45, 17 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 18:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: The username appears to be promotional. Use of a company, organization, group, website, or product name as a username is prohibited by
the username policy. Please choose another name.
@Kate(parlez) 18:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Requesting user blocked.
@Kate(parlez) 19:07, 13 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I do not want initial caps on my username. Is this possible? Thanks!
Eerway (
talk) 21:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits; Target account conflicts with SUL.
SoxBot (
talk) 22:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: The requested username is the same as your current name, aside from the first letter being in lowercase. Due to technical limitations, usernames must start with an uppercase letter. However, you may use the template {{
lowercase title}} on your user and user talk pages, and change your signature to reflect your preference.
@Kate(parlez) 22:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done. All username start with a capital letter. WJBscribe(talk) 13:46, 17 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: This is a shortened version of my name, phonetically, and a lot less to type each time. (sorry, I'll put it on the correct page... sorry about that.)
OiseauTemp (
talk) 08:31, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 08:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Request was made by ip 109.93.206.120, instead of the original account.
SoxBot (
talk) 19:48, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done - please make the request while signed in to the account that is to be renamed. WJBscribe(talk) 13:49, 17 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I was being abused beacause of it
212.219.249.6 (
talk) 14:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Request was made by ip 212.219.249.6, instead of the original account.
SoxBot (
talk) 14:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done - please make the request while signed in to the account that is to be renamed. WJBscribe(talk) 13:49, 17 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Using this new name on all foruns to avoid spam in the old username(same as my email so i get too much spam)
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 22:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
==== Master Templar ==== 15:52, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 15:54, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Could you please file another correctly formatted request? Thanks. –Juliancolton |
Talk 03:18, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I receive too much spam in my email account wich have the same username as wikipedia therefore i wish to change my username here
Rodrigodc01 (
talk) 10:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 10:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Your rename has already happened. Log out and log in as User:Jedi_Master_Yavin4. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 12:17, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 18:36, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Your target username seems to stand for "Webteam The Children's Hospital", which implies that a group is editing this account. This is prohibited by
WP:NOSHARE. I have softblocked the account. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 23:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: Your RiverBendAcademy account has a
unified login, though you only have one edit on Commons and no edits on Meta (see
here). Are you fine with being renamed just on this wiki, which will detach this account from your global account? ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 02:51, 10 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: harassment due fact that I am a police officer
Ericbonetti (
talk) 23:05, 9 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 23:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: As SoxBot was kind enough to inform you of, this account already exists, though it meets the criteria for
usurpation. However, due to the reason behind your request you might not wish to wait the 7 days that it takes for an usurpation to be carried out. Is there another name, not listed at
Special:ListUsers, that you would prefer?
@Kate(parlez) 23:11, 9 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I like this one better for discussion purposes Ed Hawryliw Culinary Artist 19:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 19:42, 10 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Seems a tad promotional to me, but I would like to hear other clerk's and bureaucrat opinions.
@Kate(parlez) 00:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done looks too all intents to be promotional, plus the requesting user has made no attempt to convince us otherwise.
The Rambling Man (
talk) 16:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits; Target account conflicts with SUL.
SoxBot (
talk) 10:18, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: The current name can be considered offensive under some circumstances, and additionally there are some personal reasons that led up to this decision.
Sepp18 (
talk) 09:35, 20 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 09:36, 20 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: We are the same person.
Higor Douglas (
talk) 02:12, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 02:16, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Please note that merging two accounts is technically impossible. You can simply stop using "Higordouglas" and only edit using "Higor Douglas" from now on (and add a link to
User:Higordouglas to your userpage) instead. Regards SoWhy 08:01, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Accounts can't be merged. As SoWhy mentioned, simply redirect or link to the Higor Douglas userpages from the Higordouglas userpages. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 22:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: The username appears to be promotional. Use of a company, organization, group, website, or product name as a username is prohibited by
the username policy. Please choose another name. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 15:32, 17 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Incorrectly put in wrong username
Ukip sheffield (
talk) 14:23, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 14:24, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: The username
Ukip sheffield (
talk·contribs) has made no contributions to the project aside from this edit, or has only a few minor contributions.. Please just create the new account and begin using that one instead of the current account. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 05:23, 19 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I thought I shouldn't seperate the word like standard username proceedure.
Wildernesscrossing (
talk) 00:17, 22 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 00:18, 22 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: The username appears to be promotional. Use of a company, organization, group, website, or product name as a username is prohibited by
the username policy. Please choose another name. ("Wilderness Crossing is a northern Michigan Family Entertainment Center located in Traverse City," as you
wrote on your userpage.) ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 02:33, 22 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Requesting user now blocked. –Juliancolton |
Talk 17:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done Can resubmit if they wish to be unblocked. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 04:26, 24 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Not Allowed Company Names. There was a concern of multiple users accessing Wikipedia, but Wikipedia will only be accessed by one person
KulturFilms (
talk) 23:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 23:03, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: The username appears to be promotional. Use of a company, organization, group, website, or product name as a username is prohibited by
the username policy. Please choose another name. It seems that the username is now intended to be something similar to "Graphics Department". Could still be considered inappropriate. —
Duncan (that's me!)What I Do / What I Say 13:42, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: Please provide a reason for your request. I'm not sure how I feel about the target username; it looks more like a user class than a username, a characteristic which is usually discouraged. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:20, 17 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: want name to be all lowercase Anita De Monte 15:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits.
SoxBot (
talk) 15:43, 23 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: The requested username is the same as your current name, aside from the first letter being in lowercase. Due to technical limitations, usernames must start with an uppercase letter. However, you may use the template {{
lowercase title}} on your user and user talk pages, and change your signature to reflect your preference. SoWhy 22:41, 23 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: My account is blocked.
KulturFilms (
talk) 14:35, 23 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done "Current" username does not match the requestor's username. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 22:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC)reply
I'm sorry, the current is KulturFilms. should I send a new request? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
KulturFilms (
talk •
contribs) 15:33, 24 December 2009 (UTC)reply
You apparently did submit a new request one minute after asking this question. Further responses will be there. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 21:21, 24 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: Reason for requested renaming.
99.39.149.251 (
talk) 18:44, 24 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Request was made by ip 99.39.149.251, instead of the original account; Old username is currently blocked.
SoxBot (
talk) 18:45, 24 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done The chosen replacement username appears to be just as promotional as the original. Use of a company name as a username is prohibited by
the username policy. Additionally, the request was not made by
Nanyangco. Please follow the directions on your talk page in order to be unblocked. The username you select must not be promotional. Thank you. ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe 21:15, 24 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 14:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: - the rename is technically possible and we take all privacy requests very seriously, but I do note that you have made a considerable number of edits to an article about yourself. Are you aware of editing within
WP:COI?
The Rambling Man (
talk) 16:54, 19 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Reason: I would prefer a different username
Rishko (
talk) 15:34, 19 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 15:36, 19 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: I see you were blocked last year for "image violations". You took a long break then came back, uploading images again. Can you confirm that you will be providing correct rationales for the images you upload and this rename is not simply an opportunity to avoid scrutiny as a once-blocked editor?
The Rambling Man (
talk) 17:00, 19 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and renaming appears to be possible.
SoxBot (
talk) 01:09, 20 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: This is a repeat request. Please read the question at the original request and respond accordingly. Cheers.
The Rambling Man (
talk) 01:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Not done No reply. --
Dweller (
talk) 21:20, 27 December 2009 (UTC)reply
SoxBotBeta has evaluated this request, and a problem(s) was found. Target username exists, and it has edits, deleted edits, and/or log edits; Target account conflicts with SUL.
SoxBot (
talk) 14:18, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: As SoxBot told you, the target username exists, though it meets the criteria for
usurpation. However, your account is too new to usurp another one. In order to ensure that usurped usernames be put to good use, we prefer only to grant requests from reasonably well-established users. Is there another name, not listed at
Special:ListUsers, that you would prefer?
@Kate(parlez) 17:27, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Is it possible that Judwa.nayak is him too and he just forgot his password? Both names were registered on the same day, so it would be a pretty big coincidence if they were different people. -- SoapTalk/Contributions 21:17, 12 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Bureaucrat note: It'd be good if we could get this clarified. I wonder if a clerk could chase up the various accounts? --
Dweller (
talk) 10:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Katerenka notified them on December 12; no response AFAIK. –Juliancolton |
Talk 05:10, 29 December 2009 (UTC)reply