Category:Pages with misused citation needed templates
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Mexican public domain images
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete (no opposition).
Good Ol’factory(talk) 00:45, 20 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: If these are public domain images, then they should be moved to
commons:Category:PD-Mexico - there is no need for a local category here.
Mike Peel (
talk) 21:59, 6 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment There is also an associated template {{
PD-Coa-Mexico}}. At least one of these images has a fair use rationale, but it is unclear whether either file is correctly licensed. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 13:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 02:41, 15 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Good Ol’factory(talk) 22:56, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename.
MER-C 20:08, 11 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: "Government statements" is a more natural form of disambiguation for this category name.
Good Ol’factory(talk) 21:53, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Support surprised how underpopulated it is; perhaps there is some other parallel structure. I note the Balfour Declaration is in
Category:Government documents of the United Kingdom but not in this one. I wonder if there is a by-country tree somewhere I couldn't find.
Carlossuarez46 (
talk) 21:41, 3 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. bibliomaniac15 03:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Recently the by-state category for U.S. state supreme court justices were renamed to this format: see
CFD here. I suggest these non-state American justices categories should follow.
Good Ol’factory(talk) 02:50, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Support. Makes sense.
Grutness...wha? 10:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Oculi (
talk) 16:37, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Support Per precedent.
Dimadick (
talk) 20:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:T.A.G. Hungerford Award winners
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 19:57, 10 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The
City of Fremantle's
T.A.G. Hungerford Award is given to an unpublished manuscript by an unpublished Western Australian author. We have a
Catch-22 where, when the award is defining to people, they aren't notable enough for an article and, when they're notable enough for an article, the category is no longer defining. Accordingly, most of the winners don't have an article and, for the ones that do, this award is generally listed in passing with other awards they won later. (The only book in this category, The Fur, is likely defined by the award but would leave a
WP:SMALLCAT.) The contents are already listified
here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 02:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete as usual with
WP:OCAWARD. Listify if necessary, but I gather it is not.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 12:39, 8 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Villa Romana prize winners
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 19:57, 10 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The
Villa Romana Prize is a German art award that consists of a year residency in a villa in Florence. If you think "villa" is just hyperbole for an artist's cabin, you could not be more wrong. Check out the the
exterior architecture (stunning), the
view of Tuscan countryside (gorgeous), and the
hand-laid mosaic floors (um, okay). Most of the contents mention this award in passing as part of a list with other honors but
Käthe Kollwitz's article actually mentions what art she created during the villa year: not a damned thing! I wouldn't get any work done either in this swanky pad. The contents are already listified
here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 02:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete as usual with
WP:OCAWARD. Listify if necessary, but I gather it is not.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 12:40, 8 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:GM-stub
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete template and category; for the record, this was added by a new editor and only used on
MyLink. –
FayenaticLondon 10:29, 10 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Unproposed, doesn't follow quantity or hierarchical requirements for a stub type. Used on only one article. Also nominate its category,
Category:GM stubs, for deletion. Her Pegship (?) 00:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Lean Toward Delete The only subcategory under
Category talk:Motor vehicle company stubs and seems poorly used. (Note that I just removed the
MyLink because it's not a stub.) Willing to reconsider though if editors appear hear who can say how they use this to improve the encyclopedia.
RevelationDirect (
talk) 02:42, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Not for genetic modification, then?
Grutness...wha? 03:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Pages with misused citation needed templates
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Mexican public domain images
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete (no opposition).
Good Ol’factory(talk) 00:45, 20 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: If these are public domain images, then they should be moved to
commons:Category:PD-Mexico - there is no need for a local category here.
Mike Peel (
talk) 21:59, 6 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment There is also an associated template {{
PD-Coa-Mexico}}. At least one of these images has a fair use rationale, but it is unclear whether either file is correctly licensed. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 13:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 02:41, 15 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Good Ol’factory(talk) 22:56, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename.
MER-C 20:08, 11 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: "Government statements" is a more natural form of disambiguation for this category name.
Good Ol’factory(talk) 21:53, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Support surprised how underpopulated it is; perhaps there is some other parallel structure. I note the Balfour Declaration is in
Category:Government documents of the United Kingdom but not in this one. I wonder if there is a by-country tree somewhere I couldn't find.
Carlossuarez46 (
talk) 21:41, 3 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. bibliomaniac15 03:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Recently the by-state category for U.S. state supreme court justices were renamed to this format: see
CFD here. I suggest these non-state American justices categories should follow.
Good Ol’factory(talk) 02:50, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Support. Makes sense.
Grutness...wha? 10:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Oculi (
talk) 16:37, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Support Per precedent.
Dimadick (
talk) 20:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:T.A.G. Hungerford Award winners
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 19:57, 10 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The
City of Fremantle's
T.A.G. Hungerford Award is given to an unpublished manuscript by an unpublished Western Australian author. We have a
Catch-22 where, when the award is defining to people, they aren't notable enough for an article and, when they're notable enough for an article, the category is no longer defining. Accordingly, most of the winners don't have an article and, for the ones that do, this award is generally listed in passing with other awards they won later. (The only book in this category, The Fur, is likely defined by the award but would leave a
WP:SMALLCAT.) The contents are already listified
here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 02:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete as usual with
WP:OCAWARD. Listify if necessary, but I gather it is not.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 12:39, 8 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Villa Romana prize winners
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 19:57, 10 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The
Villa Romana Prize is a German art award that consists of a year residency in a villa in Florence. If you think "villa" is just hyperbole for an artist's cabin, you could not be more wrong. Check out the the
exterior architecture (stunning), the
view of Tuscan countryside (gorgeous), and the
hand-laid mosaic floors (um, okay). Most of the contents mention this award in passing as part of a list with other honors but
Käthe Kollwitz's article actually mentions what art she created during the villa year: not a damned thing! I wouldn't get any work done either in this swanky pad. The contents are already listified
here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 02:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete as usual with
WP:OCAWARD. Listify if necessary, but I gather it is not.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 12:40, 8 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:GM-stub
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete template and category; for the record, this was added by a new editor and only used on
MyLink. –
FayenaticLondon 10:29, 10 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Unproposed, doesn't follow quantity or hierarchical requirements for a stub type. Used on only one article. Also nominate its category,
Category:GM stubs, for deletion. Her Pegship (?) 00:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Lean Toward Delete The only subcategory under
Category talk:Motor vehicle company stubs and seems poorly used. (Note that I just removed the
MyLink because it's not a stub.) Willing to reconsider though if editors appear hear who can say how they use this to improve the encyclopedia.
RevelationDirect (
talk) 02:42, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Not for genetic modification, then?
Grutness...wha? 03:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.