November 12
Category:Nepal BIM Forum
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 10:16, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT. Contained just one item: User:Karkimahesh/sandbox, which is a draft about the Nepal BIM Forum (an NGO), but I converted its cats to links per WP:DRAFTNOCAT/ WP:USERNOCAT . I am not sure if even the head article would be WP:Notable, and I think it's very unlikely that there would be enough articles to populate it to a level that didn't fail WP:SMALLCAT. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 22:30, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Category has been emptied. Liz Read! Talk! 15:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Even if it didn't just contain a draftspace page, it would still be SMALLCAT. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 22:15, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Bleona
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 10:16, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Little need for this eponymous category with only one song and a discography page. WP:OCEPON. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 21:29, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete in line with many precedents. – Fayenatic London 22:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:18, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per both OCEPON and WP:SMALLCAT. If five years hence (or whenever) there's enough encyclopedic material for a category, then we can have a category. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 22:16, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Members of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly by term
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge per option A. MER-C 10:18, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- OPTION A
- OPTION B
- Nominator's rationale: These pairs of categories have duplicate scope. The categories for most states within Category:20th-century state legislators of Indian States and Category:21st-century state legislators of Indian States use the pattern in Option A; only Tamil Nadu uses the pattern in Option B. Karnataka used pattern A up to the 13th session ( Karnataka MLAs 2008–2013), but has categories for both patterns for the current and preceding term, and needs to settle on one or the other. So far, 15th Karnataka Legislative Assembly is the only term to have its own lead article. – Fayenatic London 21:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Merge one way or the other. I'd prefer option A per the majority of similar categories, but I'd happily change if there was some evidence that Karnataka is in some way exceptional case. But if other editors prefer B, I'll go with that, because the main priority should be to remove the duplication. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 22:33, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Merge option A, at least for now, since the majority of the tree is currently in that format. I would not mind changing the entire tree to the format of option B but that would be a separate discussion. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Merge somehow - Prefer A, which conforms to the format used for other legislatures. That it refers to the 14th assembly (not session) can be covered in a head note, if it is not already. Peterkingiron ( talk) 17:19, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- Option B per WP:RECOGNIZABLE and MOS:ABBR and WP:JARGON. "MLAs" doesn't mean anything to most readers. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 22:17, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Zee5 original programming
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge.
MER-C 10:19, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Zee5 original programming to Category:ZEE5 original programming
- Nominator's rationale: ZEE5 is correct, Zee5 is not. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:14, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support per main article ZEE5. Marcocapelle ( talk) 17:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect in the direction stated. Whatever happens, be consistent with Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_November_6#Category:ZEE5_original_films. – Fayenatic London 21:10, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Category has been emptied.
Liz
Read!
Talk! 15:22, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- That was done by an anon editor. [1] Note left at User talk:178.66.99.51#November 2019. – Fayenatic London 22:13, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- Merge, and in the direction proposed. ZEE5/ZEEL are in fact acronyms, so per MOS:ABBR and MOS:TM. This is not a case of "marketing caps", like writing "SONY" for Sony. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 22:19, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
November 12
Category:Nepal BIM Forum
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 10:16, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT. Contained just one item: User:Karkimahesh/sandbox, which is a draft about the Nepal BIM Forum (an NGO), but I converted its cats to links per WP:DRAFTNOCAT/ WP:USERNOCAT . I am not sure if even the head article would be WP:Notable, and I think it's very unlikely that there would be enough articles to populate it to a level that didn't fail WP:SMALLCAT. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 22:30, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Category has been emptied. Liz Read! Talk! 15:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Even if it didn't just contain a draftspace page, it would still be SMALLCAT. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 22:15, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Bleona
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 10:16, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Little need for this eponymous category with only one song and a discography page. WP:OCEPON. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 21:29, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete in line with many precedents. – Fayenatic London 22:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:18, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per both OCEPON and WP:SMALLCAT. If five years hence (or whenever) there's enough encyclopedic material for a category, then we can have a category. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 22:16, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Members of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly by term
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge per option A. MER-C 10:18, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- OPTION A
- OPTION B
- Nominator's rationale: These pairs of categories have duplicate scope. The categories for most states within Category:20th-century state legislators of Indian States and Category:21st-century state legislators of Indian States use the pattern in Option A; only Tamil Nadu uses the pattern in Option B. Karnataka used pattern A up to the 13th session ( Karnataka MLAs 2008–2013), but has categories for both patterns for the current and preceding term, and needs to settle on one or the other. So far, 15th Karnataka Legislative Assembly is the only term to have its own lead article. – Fayenatic London 21:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Merge one way or the other. I'd prefer option A per the majority of similar categories, but I'd happily change if there was some evidence that Karnataka is in some way exceptional case. But if other editors prefer B, I'll go with that, because the main priority should be to remove the duplication. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 22:33, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Merge option A, at least for now, since the majority of the tree is currently in that format. I would not mind changing the entire tree to the format of option B but that would be a separate discussion. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Merge somehow - Prefer A, which conforms to the format used for other legislatures. That it refers to the 14th assembly (not session) can be covered in a head note, if it is not already. Peterkingiron ( talk) 17:19, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- Option B per WP:RECOGNIZABLE and MOS:ABBR and WP:JARGON. "MLAs" doesn't mean anything to most readers. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 22:17, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Zee5 original programming
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge.
MER-C 10:19, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Zee5 original programming to Category:ZEE5 original programming
- Nominator's rationale: ZEE5 is correct, Zee5 is not. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:14, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support per main article ZEE5. Marcocapelle ( talk) 17:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect in the direction stated. Whatever happens, be consistent with Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_November_6#Category:ZEE5_original_films. – Fayenatic London 21:10, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Category has been emptied.
Liz
Read!
Talk! 15:22, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- That was done by an anon editor. [1] Note left at User talk:178.66.99.51#November 2019. – Fayenatic London 22:13, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- Merge, and in the direction proposed. ZEE5/ZEEL are in fact acronyms, so per MOS:ABBR and MOS:TM. This is not a case of "marketing caps", like writing "SONY" for Sony. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 22:19, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.