From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 14

Category:Conversion of non-Muslim places of worship into mosques

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Places of worship converted into mosques. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:00, 22 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: As a subcat of Category:Places of worship converted to a different religion, this category should have a title that reflects its scope: it's for individual places of worship, much more so than articles on the general topic of conversion to mosques. Something like Category:Places of worship converted into mosques might be cleaner, so I'd support that as well. BDD ( talk) 16:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Support Use Category:Places of worship converted into mosques. It does what it says on the tin —  Iadmc talk  16:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Yeah, the more I think about it the more I think that's the better option. Based on my understanding and Place of worship#Islam, you're not really going to have an Islamic place of worship that's not a mosque. And even if you had a Jama'at Khana that gets consecrated as a mosque, you wouldn't call that process "conversion".
On a related note, "Non-Islamic" seems more correct than "Non-Muslim" anyway. I may do an RM at the corresponding article. -- BDD ( talk) 17:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply
IIRC, "Muslim" refers to the people, "Islam" to their beliefs and practises. Therefore, "non-Islamic" would make more sense, as a building is not a person but can be a place where beliefs are practised —  Iadmc talk  18:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Correct. Chicbyaccident ( talk) 13:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Right. I think you could still say a mosque is a "Muslim place of worship"—i.e., a place where Muslims worship—but that sounds a little awkward. -- BDD ( talk) 18:01, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Conductors (music) by nationality

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: I propose the following be stripped of their (music) disambiguator as it is unnecessary, Category:Colombian conductors‎ has never had the dab and I removed it from Category:Sri Lankan conductors‎ (music) after working on Dinesh Subasinghe  Iadmc talk  15:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Albanian conductors (music)

American conductors (music) Conductors (music) from San Francisco‎ American conductor (music) stubs‎

Argentine conductors (music)‎ Armenian conductors (music)‎ Australian conductors (music)‎ Austrian conductors (music) Azerbaijani conductors (music)‎ Belgian conductors (music) Bolivian conductors (music) Brazilian conductors (music)‎

British conductors (music)‎ Conductors (music) from Northern Ireland‎ English conductors (music)‎ Gibraltarian conductors (music)‎ Scottish conductors (music) Welsh conductors (music) British conductor (music) stubs

Bulgarian conductors (music) Canadian conductors (music) Chilean conductors (music) Chinese conductors (music)‎ Costa Rican conductors (music) Croatian conductors (music) Cuban conductors (music) Czech conductors (music)‎ Czechoslovak conductors (music)‎ Danish conductors (music) Dutch conductors (music) Ecuadorian conductors (music) Egyptian conductors (music) Estonian conductors (music) Filipino conductors (music) Finnish conductors (music)‎ French conductors (music)‎ Conductors (music) from Georgia (country)

German conductors (music)‎ German conductor (music) stubs‎

Greek conductors (music) Guatemalan conductors (music)‎ Hong Kong conductors (music) Hungarian conductors (music) Icelandic conductors (music)‎ Indian conductors (music) Indonesian conductors (music) Iranian conductors (music) Iraqi conductors (music)‎ Irish conductors (music) Israeli conductors (music)‎ Italian conductors (music) Japanese conductors (music) Kazakhstani conductors (music)‎ Korean conductors (music) South Korean conductors (music)‎ Kosovar conductors (music) Latvian conductors (music) Lebanese conductors (music) Lithuanian conductors (music) Luxembourgian conductors (music)‎ Macedonian conductors (music) Mexican conductors (music) New Zealand conductors (music) Norwegian conductors (music) Panamanian conductors (music) Paraguayan conductors (music)‎ Peruvian conductors (music) Polish conductors (music) Portuguese conductors (music) Romanian conductors (music)

Russian conductors (music)‎ Imperial Russian conductors (music)‎

Salvadoran conductors (music) Scottish conductors (music)‎ Serbian conductors (music) Singaporean conductors (music) Slovak conductors (music)‎ Slovenian conductors (music)‎ South African conductors (music)‎ Soviet conductors (music)‎ Spanish conductors (music) Swedish conductors (music)‎ Swiss conductors (music) Taiwanese conductors (music)‎ Thai conductors (music) Tunisian conductors (music) Turkish conductors (music) Ukrainian conductors (music)‎ Uruguayan conductors (music)‎ Venezuelan conductors (music)‎ —  Iadmc talk  15:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Oppose – these names were decided by cfd in 2010. (Most certainly ambiguous. Also nothing is tagged.) Oculi ( talk) 16:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply
    • I don't see what's ambiguous about "Venezuelan conductors". Bus conductors are rarely notable for being bus conductors and electrical conductors have no nationality. Furthermore, the Sri Lankan conductors category page was empty so I just moved Sri Lankan conductors (music) over; I assume all the others are empty too (not checked). I reverted my tag in the Category:Conductors (music) by nationality page because the page is protected. I added this proposal to the talk page instead then realised TW had already added this discussion so I thought I'd better come over and comment. I did look at the old CfD but it closed without consensus so I thought I'd renew debate. —  Iadmc talk  16:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply
    • Or we could rename to Conductors of music by nationality/Venezuelan conductors of music? Nothing ambiguous there, as far as I can tell. —  Iadmc talk  16:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Oculi: I must be looking at the wrong discussion. Thanks for the heads up. I fine with leaving it now you've clarified the situation. It obviously makes sense to name subcats for the main cat. BTW, Colombian conductors‎ needs moving if so. —  Iadmc talk  15:33, 15 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose As ambiguous. This probably shows my lack of culture, but I actually think of train conductors first. Conductor lists a lot of possible meanings. (The main article here is Conducting with Conductor (music) being a redirect so WP:C2D doesn't really offer clear guidance here.) RevelationDirect ( talk) 01:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Procedural Note @ Iadmc: Since the categories aren't tagged, I'm assuming this is more of a conceptual pre-discussion which I'm fine with. See WP:CFD#HOWTO for background. Thanks! RevelationDirect ( talk) 01:32, 15 December 2016 (UTC) reply
    • @ RevelationDirect: Exactly that. I fact I've reconsidered after reading Oculi's posts above... and I hadn't though of trains! It makes sense as it is, following the top cat. Therefore, I'm fine with returning the one I moved back (Sri Lankan conductors back to Sri Lankan conductors (music)) and moving Colombian conductors‎ to Colombian conductors‎ (music) as it was never mover, it seems. Sorry to open this can of worms again. More research next time, methinks... —  Iadmc talk  15:33, 15 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • I tend to use 'what links here' and very rarely look at category talk pages. It is most refreshing to find that my remarks have produced a rethink. Oculi ( talk) 10:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC) reply

I've added the June 2010 CfD to Category talk:Conductors (music) by nationality. The other 82 subcats might need it too but I don't have time at the moment. Will add after the new year —  Iadmc talk  02:59, 17 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Withdraw proposal  Iadmc talk  02:59, 17 December 2016 (UTC) reply


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:History of Roman Catholicism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename, without prejudice to a future creation of Category:History of Catholicism as a parent category, if needed. Good Ol’factory (talk) 13:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Including subcategories as per History of the Catholic Church - see also Talk:Catholic Church in Armenia (preferably with equivalent changes to respective article names). Chicbyaccident ( talk) 13:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Why so? Chicbyaccident ( talk) 14:30, 15 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Simple. Catholicism (the "universal doctrine") is used to refer to Christian denominations which adhere to "episcopal polity, sacramental theology, apostolic succession and sacred tradition". Besides the Catholic Church, the term "Catholic" is used in reference to the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Oriental Orthodox Church, the Church of the East, the Anglican Communion, and the Old Catholic Churches. None is in communion with the Catholic Church, but they all view themselves as Catholic. Several of them adhere to the Four Marks of the Church: "one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church". Dimadick ( talk) 17:16, 15 December 2016 (UTC) reply
I object to the above description reflecting cpndensus. Furthermore, there is no need of an article " Catholicism in France" etc. since there already is Catholic Church in France, much less so equivalent categories. Chicbyaccident ( talk) 20:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Actually I strongly doubt if Orthodox churches are usually counted as part of Catholic churches. But Catholicism does include Old Catholic churches, independent Catholic churches, and the general visibility of Catholics and Catholic organizations in society (e.g. Catholic politic parties). Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:34, 15 December 2016 (UTC) reply

This should be a completely uncontroversial suggestion in analogy with Talk:Catholic Church in Armenia. Chicbyaccident ( talk) 23:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC) reply


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Modular Recordings discography

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: move back subcategories and delete category ( non-admin closure). Marcocapelle ( talk) 19:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: There is no need for this container category for two subcats--just link them with {{ catseealso}} (as many already are). — Justin (koavf)TCM 03:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Anabaptist denominations established in the 20th century

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. — ξ xplicit 04:43, 3 January 2017 (UTC) reply

I propose we merge Category:Anabaptist denominations established in the 20th century into Category:Anabaptist organizations established in the 20th century. They are essentially identical. For the preference of that title, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Anabaptist work group/Categories#Anabaptist General Categories. I don't actually know how to do this without editing each article individually. Sondra.kinsey ( talk) 23:56, 13 December 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Support. Chicbyaccident ( talk) 13:55, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nom. —  Iadmc talk  16:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose -- WP has a long history of categorising denominations as such. It may be that the target needs to be purged of denominations. If this does go ahead we need to ensure that the subject is also merged to Category:Anabaptist denominations to avoid the loss of data. Peterkingiron ( talk) 11:04, 19 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose per Peterkingiron. I've moved a few denominations from the organizations to the denominations category. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sigmund Freud in fiction

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. – Fayenatic L ondon 12:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: As the category Sigmund Freud in fiction clearly states it's usually about depictions of Freud himself, so in that case the category would be better if it was merged with Cultural depictions of Sigmund Freud, in line with all the other categories about cultural depictions of historical people or celebrities. User:Kjell Knudde 23:26, 14 December 2016 (UTC). reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 14

Category:Conversion of non-Muslim places of worship into mosques

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Places of worship converted into mosques. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:00, 22 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: As a subcat of Category:Places of worship converted to a different religion, this category should have a title that reflects its scope: it's for individual places of worship, much more so than articles on the general topic of conversion to mosques. Something like Category:Places of worship converted into mosques might be cleaner, so I'd support that as well. BDD ( talk) 16:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Support Use Category:Places of worship converted into mosques. It does what it says on the tin —  Iadmc talk  16:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Yeah, the more I think about it the more I think that's the better option. Based on my understanding and Place of worship#Islam, you're not really going to have an Islamic place of worship that's not a mosque. And even if you had a Jama'at Khana that gets consecrated as a mosque, you wouldn't call that process "conversion".
On a related note, "Non-Islamic" seems more correct than "Non-Muslim" anyway. I may do an RM at the corresponding article. -- BDD ( talk) 17:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply
IIRC, "Muslim" refers to the people, "Islam" to their beliefs and practises. Therefore, "non-Islamic" would make more sense, as a building is not a person but can be a place where beliefs are practised —  Iadmc talk  18:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Correct. Chicbyaccident ( talk) 13:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Right. I think you could still say a mosque is a "Muslim place of worship"—i.e., a place where Muslims worship—but that sounds a little awkward. -- BDD ( talk) 18:01, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Conductors (music) by nationality

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: I propose the following be stripped of their (music) disambiguator as it is unnecessary, Category:Colombian conductors‎ has never had the dab and I removed it from Category:Sri Lankan conductors‎ (music) after working on Dinesh Subasinghe  Iadmc talk  15:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Albanian conductors (music)

American conductors (music) Conductors (music) from San Francisco‎ American conductor (music) stubs‎

Argentine conductors (music)‎ Armenian conductors (music)‎ Australian conductors (music)‎ Austrian conductors (music) Azerbaijani conductors (music)‎ Belgian conductors (music) Bolivian conductors (music) Brazilian conductors (music)‎

British conductors (music)‎ Conductors (music) from Northern Ireland‎ English conductors (music)‎ Gibraltarian conductors (music)‎ Scottish conductors (music) Welsh conductors (music) British conductor (music) stubs

Bulgarian conductors (music) Canadian conductors (music) Chilean conductors (music) Chinese conductors (music)‎ Costa Rican conductors (music) Croatian conductors (music) Cuban conductors (music) Czech conductors (music)‎ Czechoslovak conductors (music)‎ Danish conductors (music) Dutch conductors (music) Ecuadorian conductors (music) Egyptian conductors (music) Estonian conductors (music) Filipino conductors (music) Finnish conductors (music)‎ French conductors (music)‎ Conductors (music) from Georgia (country)

German conductors (music)‎ German conductor (music) stubs‎

Greek conductors (music) Guatemalan conductors (music)‎ Hong Kong conductors (music) Hungarian conductors (music) Icelandic conductors (music)‎ Indian conductors (music) Indonesian conductors (music) Iranian conductors (music) Iraqi conductors (music)‎ Irish conductors (music) Israeli conductors (music)‎ Italian conductors (music) Japanese conductors (music) Kazakhstani conductors (music)‎ Korean conductors (music) South Korean conductors (music)‎ Kosovar conductors (music) Latvian conductors (music) Lebanese conductors (music) Lithuanian conductors (music) Luxembourgian conductors (music)‎ Macedonian conductors (music) Mexican conductors (music) New Zealand conductors (music) Norwegian conductors (music) Panamanian conductors (music) Paraguayan conductors (music)‎ Peruvian conductors (music) Polish conductors (music) Portuguese conductors (music) Romanian conductors (music)

Russian conductors (music)‎ Imperial Russian conductors (music)‎

Salvadoran conductors (music) Scottish conductors (music)‎ Serbian conductors (music) Singaporean conductors (music) Slovak conductors (music)‎ Slovenian conductors (music)‎ South African conductors (music)‎ Soviet conductors (music)‎ Spanish conductors (music) Swedish conductors (music)‎ Swiss conductors (music) Taiwanese conductors (music)‎ Thai conductors (music) Tunisian conductors (music) Turkish conductors (music) Ukrainian conductors (music)‎ Uruguayan conductors (music)‎ Venezuelan conductors (music)‎ —  Iadmc talk  15:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Oppose – these names were decided by cfd in 2010. (Most certainly ambiguous. Also nothing is tagged.) Oculi ( talk) 16:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply
    • I don't see what's ambiguous about "Venezuelan conductors". Bus conductors are rarely notable for being bus conductors and electrical conductors have no nationality. Furthermore, the Sri Lankan conductors category page was empty so I just moved Sri Lankan conductors (music) over; I assume all the others are empty too (not checked). I reverted my tag in the Category:Conductors (music) by nationality page because the page is protected. I added this proposal to the talk page instead then realised TW had already added this discussion so I thought I'd better come over and comment. I did look at the old CfD but it closed without consensus so I thought I'd renew debate. —  Iadmc talk  16:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply
    • Or we could rename to Conductors of music by nationality/Venezuelan conductors of music? Nothing ambiguous there, as far as I can tell. —  Iadmc talk  16:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Oculi: I must be looking at the wrong discussion. Thanks for the heads up. I fine with leaving it now you've clarified the situation. It obviously makes sense to name subcats for the main cat. BTW, Colombian conductors‎ needs moving if so. —  Iadmc talk  15:33, 15 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose As ambiguous. This probably shows my lack of culture, but I actually think of train conductors first. Conductor lists a lot of possible meanings. (The main article here is Conducting with Conductor (music) being a redirect so WP:C2D doesn't really offer clear guidance here.) RevelationDirect ( talk) 01:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Procedural Note @ Iadmc: Since the categories aren't tagged, I'm assuming this is more of a conceptual pre-discussion which I'm fine with. See WP:CFD#HOWTO for background. Thanks! RevelationDirect ( talk) 01:32, 15 December 2016 (UTC) reply
    • @ RevelationDirect: Exactly that. I fact I've reconsidered after reading Oculi's posts above... and I hadn't though of trains! It makes sense as it is, following the top cat. Therefore, I'm fine with returning the one I moved back (Sri Lankan conductors back to Sri Lankan conductors (music)) and moving Colombian conductors‎ to Colombian conductors‎ (music) as it was never mover, it seems. Sorry to open this can of worms again. More research next time, methinks... —  Iadmc talk  15:33, 15 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • I tend to use 'what links here' and very rarely look at category talk pages. It is most refreshing to find that my remarks have produced a rethink. Oculi ( talk) 10:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC) reply

I've added the June 2010 CfD to Category talk:Conductors (music) by nationality. The other 82 subcats might need it too but I don't have time at the moment. Will add after the new year —  Iadmc talk  02:59, 17 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Withdraw proposal  Iadmc talk  02:59, 17 December 2016 (UTC) reply


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:History of Roman Catholicism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename, without prejudice to a future creation of Category:History of Catholicism as a parent category, if needed. Good Ol’factory (talk) 13:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Including subcategories as per History of the Catholic Church - see also Talk:Catholic Church in Armenia (preferably with equivalent changes to respective article names). Chicbyaccident ( talk) 13:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Why so? Chicbyaccident ( talk) 14:30, 15 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Simple. Catholicism (the "universal doctrine") is used to refer to Christian denominations which adhere to "episcopal polity, sacramental theology, apostolic succession and sacred tradition". Besides the Catholic Church, the term "Catholic" is used in reference to the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Oriental Orthodox Church, the Church of the East, the Anglican Communion, and the Old Catholic Churches. None is in communion with the Catholic Church, but they all view themselves as Catholic. Several of them adhere to the Four Marks of the Church: "one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church". Dimadick ( talk) 17:16, 15 December 2016 (UTC) reply
I object to the above description reflecting cpndensus. Furthermore, there is no need of an article " Catholicism in France" etc. since there already is Catholic Church in France, much less so equivalent categories. Chicbyaccident ( talk) 20:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Actually I strongly doubt if Orthodox churches are usually counted as part of Catholic churches. But Catholicism does include Old Catholic churches, independent Catholic churches, and the general visibility of Catholics and Catholic organizations in society (e.g. Catholic politic parties). Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:34, 15 December 2016 (UTC) reply

This should be a completely uncontroversial suggestion in analogy with Talk:Catholic Church in Armenia. Chicbyaccident ( talk) 23:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC) reply


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Modular Recordings discography

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: move back subcategories and delete category ( non-admin closure). Marcocapelle ( talk) 19:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: There is no need for this container category for two subcats--just link them with {{ catseealso}} (as many already are). — Justin (koavf)TCM 03:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Anabaptist denominations established in the 20th century

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. — ξ xplicit 04:43, 3 January 2017 (UTC) reply

I propose we merge Category:Anabaptist denominations established in the 20th century into Category:Anabaptist organizations established in the 20th century. They are essentially identical. For the preference of that title, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Anabaptist work group/Categories#Anabaptist General Categories. I don't actually know how to do this without editing each article individually. Sondra.kinsey ( talk) 23:56, 13 December 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Support. Chicbyaccident ( talk) 13:55, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nom. —  Iadmc talk  16:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose -- WP has a long history of categorising denominations as such. It may be that the target needs to be purged of denominations. If this does go ahead we need to ensure that the subject is also merged to Category:Anabaptist denominations to avoid the loss of data. Peterkingiron ( talk) 11:04, 19 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose per Peterkingiron. I've moved a few denominations from the organizations to the denominations category. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sigmund Freud in fiction

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. – Fayenatic L ondon 12:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: As the category Sigmund Freud in fiction clearly states it's usually about depictions of Freud himself, so in that case the category would be better if it was merged with Cultural depictions of Sigmund Freud, in line with all the other categories about cultural depictions of historical people or celebrities. User:Kjell Knudde 23:26, 14 December 2016 (UTC). reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook