The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Delete.
Vegaswikian (
talk) 00:07, 3 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale:Delete There's been a lot of effort put into not creating multiple articles related to this murder. The last thing we need is a category. In any case, the category currently contains two unused unfree images likely to be deleted in the coming days.
Pichpich (
talk) 23:33, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete. There seems to be little to put in a
Murder of Meredith Kercher category - I can think of no pages that could be added except the main article and the article for the
TV film. The only other candidates for inclusion are images such as
this one. SuperMarioMan 00:00, 26 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. --
John (
talk) 19:44, 2 May 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wikipedian Help Page Patrollers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Rename per nom, although not 100% convinced of the usefulness of a category to seek out those who regularly patrol the help desk. Presumably you wouldn't need to go seek out such users, as they would patrolling the help desk to answer whatever question you may have.
VegaDark (
talk) 21:14, 28 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Unsourced BLP Rescuers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This so-far-empty
user category is intended for users who either "rescue" (i.e., source, improve) unsourced BLPs or disagree with
BLP deletionism. The first is a broadly defined but valid
collaboration category but the second is a single-issue
editing philosophy category (in truth, closer to a "
support/oppose" category, for those who oppose
WP:BLPPROD).
For now, I would say delete as empty, without prejudice to recreating as a 'members' or 'participants' category for the
BLP Rescue Squad, if the project wishes it. -- Black Falcon(
talk) 18:33, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Seems to be empty for more than a year.--
Lenticel(
talk) 01:38, 26 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment I created the category. I have no issues with the category getting deleted. If the nominator and other editors have no issues, I can delete the page myself (could someone kindly leave a note on my talk page in that case, as I am not watching this page?). Thanks and best.
Wifione ....... Leave a message 09:36, 26 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete as inappropriately named category with zero actual users in it. We can allow creation of an appropriately named category that we can decide the merits on keeping if such a category created, but don't need to decide that now.
VegaDark (
talk) 21:14, 28 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment isn't this what the article rescue squadron does?
65.94.45.160 (
talk) 04:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Dicrurus
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Merge. Same genus. Dicrurus is the scientific name, Drongo is the common name. I believe that the common name is usually preferred in such cases.
Dawynn (
talk) 14:35, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Rhipidurinae
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Delete. Now treated as full family (
Rhipiduridae).
Dawynn (
talk) 14:25, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Monarchinae
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Delete. Moved from subfamily to full family (
Monarchidae).
Dawynn (
talk) 14:23, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Rating-deferred G.I. Joe articles
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per nom. The purpose of this category is not entirely clear, but it appears to be redundant to
Category:NA-Class G.I. Joe articles (pages within the scope of WikiProject G.I. Joe that do not, at this time, require a quality assessment). -- Black Falcon(
talk) 18:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete per Black Falcon.--
Lenticel(
talk) 01:50, 26 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Long-distance riding
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Understandably, articles about long-distance bicyclists have started to be added to this category. Horsemen might be next. Best to state the
obvious rather than be coy about what this category is for.
Dennis Bratland (
talk) 04:10, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Wait until we see what happens with the main article which is up for renaming.
Vegaswikian (
talk) 05:16, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Support regardless of what the main article is called, the ambiguity of the category name causes too many problems.
65.94.45.160 (
talk) 05:35, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Support – regardless of what the main article is called. My first guess for this would be horse riding.
Occuli (
talk) 13:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Support. Follow the article. Current consensus is "Long-distance motorcycle riding", but.. whatever the article ends up being called is what this category should be called.
tedder (
talk) 16:07, 26 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Delete.
Vegaswikian (
talk) 00:07, 3 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale:Delete There's been a lot of effort put into not creating multiple articles related to this murder. The last thing we need is a category. In any case, the category currently contains two unused unfree images likely to be deleted in the coming days.
Pichpich (
talk) 23:33, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete. There seems to be little to put in a
Murder of Meredith Kercher category - I can think of no pages that could be added except the main article and the article for the
TV film. The only other candidates for inclusion are images such as
this one. SuperMarioMan 00:00, 26 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. --
John (
talk) 19:44, 2 May 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wikipedian Help Page Patrollers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Rename per nom, although not 100% convinced of the usefulness of a category to seek out those who regularly patrol the help desk. Presumably you wouldn't need to go seek out such users, as they would patrolling the help desk to answer whatever question you may have.
VegaDark (
talk) 21:14, 28 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Unsourced BLP Rescuers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This so-far-empty
user category is intended for users who either "rescue" (i.e., source, improve) unsourced BLPs or disagree with
BLP deletionism. The first is a broadly defined but valid
collaboration category but the second is a single-issue
editing philosophy category (in truth, closer to a "
support/oppose" category, for those who oppose
WP:BLPPROD).
For now, I would say delete as empty, without prejudice to recreating as a 'members' or 'participants' category for the
BLP Rescue Squad, if the project wishes it. -- Black Falcon(
talk) 18:33, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Seems to be empty for more than a year.--
Lenticel(
talk) 01:38, 26 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment I created the category. I have no issues with the category getting deleted. If the nominator and other editors have no issues, I can delete the page myself (could someone kindly leave a note on my talk page in that case, as I am not watching this page?). Thanks and best.
Wifione ....... Leave a message 09:36, 26 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete as inappropriately named category with zero actual users in it. We can allow creation of an appropriately named category that we can decide the merits on keeping if such a category created, but don't need to decide that now.
VegaDark (
talk) 21:14, 28 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment isn't this what the article rescue squadron does?
65.94.45.160 (
talk) 04:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Dicrurus
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Merge. Same genus. Dicrurus is the scientific name, Drongo is the common name. I believe that the common name is usually preferred in such cases.
Dawynn (
talk) 14:35, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Rhipidurinae
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Delete. Now treated as full family (
Rhipiduridae).
Dawynn (
talk) 14:25, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Monarchinae
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Delete. Moved from subfamily to full family (
Monarchidae).
Dawynn (
talk) 14:23, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Rating-deferred G.I. Joe articles
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per nom. The purpose of this category is not entirely clear, but it appears to be redundant to
Category:NA-Class G.I. Joe articles (pages within the scope of WikiProject G.I. Joe that do not, at this time, require a quality assessment). -- Black Falcon(
talk) 18:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete per Black Falcon.--
Lenticel(
talk) 01:50, 26 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Long-distance riding
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Understandably, articles about long-distance bicyclists have started to be added to this category. Horsemen might be next. Best to state the
obvious rather than be coy about what this category is for.
Dennis Bratland (
talk) 04:10, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Wait until we see what happens with the main article which is up for renaming.
Vegaswikian (
talk) 05:16, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Support regardless of what the main article is called, the ambiguity of the category name causes too many problems.
65.94.45.160 (
talk) 05:35, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Support – regardless of what the main article is called. My first guess for this would be horse riding.
Occuli (
talk) 13:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Support. Follow the article. Current consensus is "Long-distance motorcycle riding", but.. whatever the article ends up being called is what this category should be called.
tedder (
talk) 16:07, 26 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.