< October 13 | October 15 > |
---|
The result of the debate was Keep. «» Who ?¿? meta 06:56, 22 October 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. «» Who ?¿? meta 06:53, 22 October 2005 (UTC) reply
All articles now moved to Category:Chicagoans (there were only a dozen or so remaining). It's had a merge notice since 5 August which no-one has commented on. Ian ≡ talk 11:12, 14 October 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was No consensus (no change). «» Who ?¿? meta 06:50, 22 October 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. «» Who ?¿? meta 06:46, 22 October 2005 (UTC) reply
It is a poorly defined category. Brian j d | Why restrict HTML? | 09:13, 14 October 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. «» Who ?¿? meta 06:45, 22 October 2005 (UTC) reply
This is a more correct name, first because it refers to the specific office we are interested in rather than the general principle, thus excluding articles like, for instance, President of Harvard University, and also because this is the term used in academic and professional literature on the subject. See for instance, the seminal book on the Presidency, Richard Neustadt's Presidential Power, or any political science journal. Christopher Parham (talk) 08:02, 14 October 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Speedy deleted as long empty. ∞ Who ?¿? 21:37, 14 October 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty covered by Category:Burkinabé athletes. Dunno should this be in the speedy rename section probably should be speedy rename/delete section. MeltBanana 01:37, 14 October 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Speedy deleted. ∞ Who ?¿? 21:33, 14 October 2005 (UTC) reply
Only contains itself. Correctly capitalised Category:Armenian poets exists. MeltBanana 00:15, 14 October 2005 (UTC) reply
< October 13 | October 15 > |
---|
The result of the debate was Keep. «» Who ?¿? meta 06:56, 22 October 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. «» Who ?¿? meta 06:53, 22 October 2005 (UTC) reply
All articles now moved to Category:Chicagoans (there were only a dozen or so remaining). It's had a merge notice since 5 August which no-one has commented on. Ian ≡ talk 11:12, 14 October 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was No consensus (no change). «» Who ?¿? meta 06:50, 22 October 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. «» Who ?¿? meta 06:46, 22 October 2005 (UTC) reply
It is a poorly defined category. Brian j d | Why restrict HTML? | 09:13, 14 October 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. «» Who ?¿? meta 06:45, 22 October 2005 (UTC) reply
This is a more correct name, first because it refers to the specific office we are interested in rather than the general principle, thus excluding articles like, for instance, President of Harvard University, and also because this is the term used in academic and professional literature on the subject. See for instance, the seminal book on the Presidency, Richard Neustadt's Presidential Power, or any political science journal. Christopher Parham (talk) 08:02, 14 October 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Speedy deleted as long empty. ∞ Who ?¿? 21:37, 14 October 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty covered by Category:Burkinabé athletes. Dunno should this be in the speedy rename section probably should be speedy rename/delete section. MeltBanana 01:37, 14 October 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Speedy deleted. ∞ Who ?¿? 21:33, 14 October 2005 (UTC) reply
Only contains itself. Correctly capitalised Category:Armenian poets exists. MeltBanana 00:15, 14 October 2005 (UTC) reply