The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:17, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This category has wound up being used as a default "has something to do with computing" category, rather than being for articles that are specifically about terminology. After some discussion on Category talk:Computer terminology it seems like the best approach to sorting this out is to just move everything over into the existing Category:Computing, which should be the default "has something to do with computing" category but which currently has only a handful of articles in it. The contents of that category can then be sorted out into subcategories over time through the usual Wikipedia way. I'm putting it here as a cfr so that we can get Pearle to do all the heavy lifting for us. Bryan 23:40, 28 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:15, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Seems like a very broad category which can refer to any form of "world record". Either it gets broken down in a logical manner, or we can do away with it completely.-- Huaiwei 18:14, 28 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:12, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Speedy delete: It has been de-populated, de-categorised and superseded by the correctly (consistently) named Category:Prime Ministers of Australia.-- Cyberjunkie 04:48, 28 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:14, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Nothing there and even if there were its under the wrong parent cat. -- Hooperbloob 02:33, 28 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 15:13, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
mistakenly thought the ice hockey team was a former NHL team and that i was forming a subset for a Category:NHL players. the league the team played in has no cat. - Mayumashu 02:04, 28 May 2005 (UTC) reply
2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:17, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This category has wound up being used as a default "has something to do with computing" category, rather than being for articles that are specifically about terminology. After some discussion on Category talk:Computer terminology it seems like the best approach to sorting this out is to just move everything over into the existing Category:Computing, which should be the default "has something to do with computing" category but which currently has only a handful of articles in it. The contents of that category can then be sorted out into subcategories over time through the usual Wikipedia way. I'm putting it here as a cfr so that we can get Pearle to do all the heavy lifting for us. Bryan 23:40, 28 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:15, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Seems like a very broad category which can refer to any form of "world record". Either it gets broken down in a logical manner, or we can do away with it completely.-- Huaiwei 18:14, 28 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:12, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Speedy delete: It has been de-populated, de-categorised and superseded by the correctly (consistently) named Category:Prime Ministers of Australia.-- Cyberjunkie 04:48, 28 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:14, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Nothing there and even if there were its under the wrong parent cat. -- Hooperbloob 02:33, 28 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 15:13, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
mistakenly thought the ice hockey team was a former NHL team and that i was forming a subset for a Category:NHL players. the league the team played in has no cat. - Mayumashu 02:04, 28 May 2005 (UTC) reply
2005 (UTC)