Operator: Avicennasis ( talk · contribs)
Time filed: 20:29, Friday July 29, 2011 ( UTC)
Automatic or Manual: Automatic unsupervised
Programming language(s): AutoWikiBrowser
Source code available: Yes
Function overview: Maintain indef blocked categories
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): daily
Estimated number of pages affected: unknown
Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Yes
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Yes
Function details: Will grab users in the indef block categories, and check to see if they are, in fact, indef blocked. If a user is not found to be blocked, the username will be set aside on a subpage. If, after two weeks, the user is still in the category, and still unblocked, AvicBot will remove the category from the user talk page.
Categories affected:
Is there a policy/guideline/discussion regarding their use that you can link in "relevant discussion" as a "consensus for this task"? If not, could you leave a note on the category talk/some noticeboard regarding this, please. Although I doubt this will be controversial. — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 10:11, 30 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Anyway, Approved for trial (20 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Take however long you need to make the page list (if you haven't already). — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 11:54, 30 July 2011 (UTC) reply
{{#switch:User talk|User|User talk=[[Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for a violation of the username policy|{{PAGENAME}}]]}}
and
[2] {{#ifeq: yes | yes |[[Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for link-spamming||{{PAGENAME}}]] | [[Category:Wikipedians who have temporarily been blocked for link-spamming||{{PAGENAME}}]] }}
. Not a deal-breaker, but could be nice. Are you are willing to implement these?
Approved for extended trial (75 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Anyway, let's catch any more weird cases to see that nothing breaks. —
HELLKNOWZ ▎
TALK 08:07, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
reply{{#switch:User talk|User|User talk=[[Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for a violation of the username policy|{{PAGENAME}}]]}}
when it finds the whole sting,
e.g., here, else it removes [[Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for a violation of the username policy|{{PAGENAME}}]]
,
e.g., here. Likewise with other cats.
Avic
ennasis @ 05:46, 19 Av 5771 / 05:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
reply{{
OperatorAssistanceNeeded|D}}
- Any updates on how this is going?
Hersfold (
t/
a/
c) 15:40, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
reply
{{
t|BAG assistance needed}}
.
I see everything looks good, and no reason to deny this bot, can a BAGer give the go ahead?
ΔT The only constant 16:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
replyApproved. Looks good -- Chris 11:11, 13 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Operator: Avicennasis ( talk · contribs)
Time filed: 20:29, Friday July 29, 2011 ( UTC)
Automatic or Manual: Automatic unsupervised
Programming language(s): AutoWikiBrowser
Source code available: Yes
Function overview: Maintain indef blocked categories
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): daily
Estimated number of pages affected: unknown
Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Yes
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Yes
Function details: Will grab users in the indef block categories, and check to see if they are, in fact, indef blocked. If a user is not found to be blocked, the username will be set aside on a subpage. If, after two weeks, the user is still in the category, and still unblocked, AvicBot will remove the category from the user talk page.
Categories affected:
Is there a policy/guideline/discussion regarding their use that you can link in "relevant discussion" as a "consensus for this task"? If not, could you leave a note on the category talk/some noticeboard regarding this, please. Although I doubt this will be controversial. — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 10:11, 30 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Anyway, Approved for trial (20 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Take however long you need to make the page list (if you haven't already). — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 11:54, 30 July 2011 (UTC) reply
{{#switch:User talk|User|User talk=[[Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for a violation of the username policy|{{PAGENAME}}]]}}
and
[2] {{#ifeq: yes | yes |[[Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for link-spamming||{{PAGENAME}}]] | [[Category:Wikipedians who have temporarily been blocked for link-spamming||{{PAGENAME}}]] }}
. Not a deal-breaker, but could be nice. Are you are willing to implement these?
Approved for extended trial (75 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Anyway, let's catch any more weird cases to see that nothing breaks. —
HELLKNOWZ ▎
TALK 08:07, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
reply{{#switch:User talk|User|User talk=[[Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for a violation of the username policy|{{PAGENAME}}]]}}
when it finds the whole sting,
e.g., here, else it removes [[Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for a violation of the username policy|{{PAGENAME}}]]
,
e.g., here. Likewise with other cats.
Avic
ennasis @ 05:46, 19 Av 5771 / 05:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
reply{{
OperatorAssistanceNeeded|D}}
- Any updates on how this is going?
Hersfold (
t/
a/
c) 15:40, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
reply
{{
t|BAG assistance needed}}
.
I see everything looks good, and no reason to deny this bot, can a BAGer give the go ahead?
ΔT The only constant 16:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
replyApproved. Looks good -- Chris 11:11, 13 October 2011 (UTC) reply