This page is currently inactive and is retained for
historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
This project page was started to identify and collect a list of articles which are more comprehensive than their Encyclopædia Britannica counterparts. Comparisons include: variety of relevant sources, better citations (footnoting or inline citations), article length, facts that are absent in the EB, and article neutrality.
In other words, can Wikipedia's process actually produce better articles than the EB, or is EB editor Robert McHenry right and we are unable to produce a better researched, better sourced and more comprehensive article?
Please provide a reason why it is more comprehensive, and only include featured articles
Please only list articles that have been featured
This page is currently inactive and is retained for
historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
This project page was started to identify and collect a list of articles which are more comprehensive than their Encyclopædia Britannica counterparts. Comparisons include: variety of relevant sources, better citations (footnoting or inline citations), article length, facts that are absent in the EB, and article neutrality.
In other words, can Wikipedia's process actually produce better articles than the EB, or is EB editor Robert McHenry right and we are unable to produce a better researched, better sourced and more comprehensive article?
Please provide a reason why it is more comprehensive, and only include featured articles
Please only list articles that have been featured