- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Less Unless ( talk) 20:18, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Yashesh Acharya
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Yashesh Acharya ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find any sources to suggest that he meets WP:FILMMAKER, WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. His claim to notability is apparently being involved in a world record but the film that allegedly broke this world record does not seem to be notable itself so I cannot see how Acharya, as its associate director, would be notable. None of his novels seem to have gained any media attention either. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:52, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Authors, and India. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - No WP:RS to support WP:Notability; plenty WP:Autobio Plutonium27 ( talk) 15:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly doesn't pass WP:FILMMAKER, WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG Khorang 09:34, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:FILMMAKER, WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG, sources in the article are all promotional. BEFORE showed no reviews of films or writings that has SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need clearly Ind RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse. // Timothy :: talk 01:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. The article subject isn’t covered in any significant depth by reliable independent secondary sources, e.g. fails WP:GNG, WP:AUTHOR and WP:FILMMAKER. Shawn Teller ( talk) 23:20, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Less Unless ( talk) 20:18, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Yashesh Acharya
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Yashesh Acharya ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find any sources to suggest that he meets WP:FILMMAKER, WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. His claim to notability is apparently being involved in a world record but the film that allegedly broke this world record does not seem to be notable itself so I cannot see how Acharya, as its associate director, would be notable. None of his novels seem to have gained any media attention either. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:52, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Authors, and India. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - No WP:RS to support WP:Notability; plenty WP:Autobio Plutonium27 ( talk) 15:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly doesn't pass WP:FILMMAKER, WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG Khorang 09:34, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:FILMMAKER, WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG, sources in the article are all promotional. BEFORE showed no reviews of films or writings that has SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need clearly Ind RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse. // Timothy :: talk 01:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. The article subject isn’t covered in any significant depth by reliable independent secondary sources, e.g. fails WP:GNG, WP:AUTHOR and WP:FILMMAKER. Shawn Teller ( talk) 23:20, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.