- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
White Stag Leadership Development Program
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- White Stag Leadership Development Program ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
"Advertising or other spam without any relevant or encyclopedic content. "
UPE is extremely likely based on off-wiki evidence that correlates this article to the author responsible for vast majority of authorship on this article.
Sourcing is absolutely terrible and advertorial intents are quite evident. I am not sure if it meets NORG either, although the pure advert nature alone merits a deletion. Graywalls ( talk) 12:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, and California. Graywalls ( talk) 12:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scouting-related deletion discussions. Graywalls ( talk) 22:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Wow! almost all sources are primary and from their own websites. Although an organization from 1958 might have other better news out there, it's no bother searching since almost entirety of the article must be trimmed once primary sources are removed. Perfectstrangerz ( talk) 01:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Perfectstrangerz. RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk) 11:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
White Stag Leadership Development Program
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- White Stag Leadership Development Program ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
"Advertising or other spam without any relevant or encyclopedic content. "
UPE is extremely likely based on off-wiki evidence that correlates this article to the author responsible for vast majority of authorship on this article.
Sourcing is absolutely terrible and advertorial intents are quite evident. I am not sure if it meets NORG either, although the pure advert nature alone merits a deletion. Graywalls ( talk) 12:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, and California. Graywalls ( talk) 12:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scouting-related deletion discussions. Graywalls ( talk) 22:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Wow! almost all sources are primary and from their own websites. Although an organization from 1958 might have other better news out there, it's no bother searching since almost entirety of the article must be trimmed once primary sources are removed. Perfectstrangerz ( talk) 01:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Perfectstrangerz. RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk) 11:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.