The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn NW ( Talk) 03:19, 27 April 2011 (UTC) reply
A ridiculously POV article that seems to only serve as an anti "homosexuality in the military" coatrack. It doesn't look like the term is used for anything other than "this can undermine unit cohesion" claims from DADT debates. With all the DADT stuff removed, it's nothing more than a quotefarm and dictdef. Yaksar (let's chat) 00:32, 25 April 2011 (UTC) reply
*Delete Hooray,
WP:QUOTEFARM. This article is a canvas for points-of-view on a topic that is closer to a definition than an actual encyclopedic topic. There is no history to "unit cohesion," and no practical distinction between it and "teamwork" or any number of valid redirects. If someone can convince me that "unit cohesion" is so notably distinct a topic on its own from "teamwork" or any number of possible merge options under the umbrella of the military, I might change my vote, but I don't see any compelling arguments above. You can use a pile of quotes to make just about any phrase notable. Doesn't mean it's notable as a topic.
ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ
bomb 06:58, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn NW ( Talk) 03:19, 27 April 2011 (UTC) reply
A ridiculously POV article that seems to only serve as an anti "homosexuality in the military" coatrack. It doesn't look like the term is used for anything other than "this can undermine unit cohesion" claims from DADT debates. With all the DADT stuff removed, it's nothing more than a quotefarm and dictdef. Yaksar (let's chat) 00:32, 25 April 2011 (UTC) reply
*Delete Hooray,
WP:QUOTEFARM. This article is a canvas for points-of-view on a topic that is closer to a definition than an actual encyclopedic topic. There is no history to "unit cohesion," and no practical distinction between it and "teamwork" or any number of valid redirects. If someone can convince me that "unit cohesion" is so notably distinct a topic on its own from "teamwork" or any number of possible merge options under the umbrella of the military, I might change my vote, but I don't see any compelling arguments above. You can use a pile of quotes to make just about any phrase notable. Doesn't mean it's notable as a topic.
ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ
bomb 06:58, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
reply