The result was Delete. The continued allowance of an article to occupy an entry on Wikipedia demands the presentation of neutral, third-party reliable sources to support notability; to cut straight to the core of this debate, no such sources have been provided.
Anthøny 18:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC) reply
I honestly don't understand this article at all. It is a stub composed of with pretty bad grammar, and has no references to merit notability. A Google search provided me little information about this person as well. Tavix ( talk) 02:13, 1 June 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. The continued allowance of an article to occupy an entry on Wikipedia demands the presentation of neutral, third-party reliable sources to support notability; to cut straight to the core of this debate, no such sources have been provided.
Anthøny 18:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC) reply
I honestly don't understand this article at all. It is a stub composed of with pretty bad grammar, and has no references to merit notability. A Google search provided me little information about this person as well. Tavix ( talk) 02:13, 1 June 2008 (UTC) reply