The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus that the subject is notably separable from
Fork, meets
WP:GNG and the entry is sufficiently encyclopedic.
(non-admin closure)—Ganesha811 (
talk) 00:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep I've added a couple of sources. I think there's enough to justify an article.
OsFish (
talk) 11:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep or Redirect per Fram's suggestion. I think it's possible to expand the article, and have dropped a few citations in; the problem is the lack of obvious sources that have sufficient detail to cite from. If we can't get above 1,500 characters of prose (currently at just under 1,100) then I think a redirect would be preferable.
Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 17:13, 28 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - Exactly the sort of helpful reference work that the Disney Little Mermaid Ariel needed to help sort out her gadgets and gizmos from her thingamabobs.
jengod (
talk) 23:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - Toasting Fork is a distinct cooking implement, not directly covered by the article
Fork whereby it is explicitly focused on forks either to hold them to cut with a knife or to lift them to the mouth. Also sufficient references in my view.
Turner537 (
talk) 15:18, 30 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus that the subject is notably separable from
Fork, meets
WP:GNG and the entry is sufficiently encyclopedic.
(non-admin closure)—Ganesha811 (
talk) 00:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep I've added a couple of sources. I think there's enough to justify an article.
OsFish (
talk) 11:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep or Redirect per Fram's suggestion. I think it's possible to expand the article, and have dropped a few citations in; the problem is the lack of obvious sources that have sufficient detail to cite from. If we can't get above 1,500 characters of prose (currently at just under 1,100) then I think a redirect would be preferable.
Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 17:13, 28 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - Exactly the sort of helpful reference work that the Disney Little Mermaid Ariel needed to help sort out her gadgets and gizmos from her thingamabobs.
jengod (
talk) 23:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - Toasting Fork is a distinct cooking implement, not directly covered by the article
Fork whereby it is explicitly focused on forks either to hold them to cut with a knife or to lift them to the mouth. Also sufficient references in my view.
Turner537 (
talk) 15:18, 30 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.