- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. With sadness, because it's a cute show. :-( Joyous! | Talk 00:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The Happy Family Show
- The Happy Family Show ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I actually like the show for what it is and I'm not saying a show like this can't be notable, but I'm nominating this for deletion only due to the fact that as of now, it has a low amount of coverage. Los Angeles Times is a very independent source, but we need more than one independent source for the subject to be qualifiable for a Wikipedia article. editorEهեইдအ😎 22:35, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 04:41, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete It's surprising that something that has such a following has not gotten much verifiable recognition that qualifies for a wikipedia article under the significant coverage criteria. And yet that appears to be the case. The sole reference to the LA Times article is not about this show; rather, it receives tangential acknowledgement near the end. Given that so much of this entry's content is not referenced, it's probably original research, which alone merits deletion.
ShelbyMarion (
talk) 18:57, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- I actually do still look forward to the day when this show becomes notable, though, but beggars can't be choosers I guess :/ editorEهեইдအ😎 22:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Can't find any sources. Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 02:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. With sadness, because it's a cute show. :-( Joyous! | Talk 00:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The Happy Family Show
- The Happy Family Show ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I actually like the show for what it is and I'm not saying a show like this can't be notable, but I'm nominating this for deletion only due to the fact that as of now, it has a low amount of coverage. Los Angeles Times is a very independent source, but we need more than one independent source for the subject to be qualifiable for a Wikipedia article. editorEهեইдအ😎 22:35, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 04:41, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete It's surprising that something that has such a following has not gotten much verifiable recognition that qualifies for a wikipedia article under the significant coverage criteria. And yet that appears to be the case. The sole reference to the LA Times article is not about this show; rather, it receives tangential acknowledgement near the end. Given that so much of this entry's content is not referenced, it's probably original research, which alone merits deletion.
ShelbyMarion (
talk) 18:57, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- I actually do still look forward to the day when this show becomes notable, though, but beggars can't be choosers I guess :/ editorEهեইдအ😎 22:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Can't find any sources. Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 02:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.