The result was Speedy Keep - Nomination withdrawn, no delete !votes (non-admin closure) Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 01:48, 21 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The article I feel fails
WP:NOTABLE and is a
WP:SYNTHESIS, using references which do not discuss the sinclair method, and acts as an
WP:ADVERT for
the sinclair method website. A search using quotation marks for "sinclair method" in pubmed turned up zero results. A single review paper does mention the method but it is written by none other than sinclair himself. The other references are either not relevant at all or by sinclair himself. The method has no mainstream acceptance that I can tell outside of Dr Sinclair's personal website mentioned above and apparently wikipedia.--
Literaturegeek |
T@1k? 21:54, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was Speedy Keep - Nomination withdrawn, no delete !votes (non-admin closure) Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 01:48, 21 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The article I feel fails
WP:NOTABLE and is a
WP:SYNTHESIS, using references which do not discuss the sinclair method, and acts as an
WP:ADVERT for
the sinclair method website. A search using quotation marks for "sinclair method" in pubmed turned up zero results. A single review paper does mention the method but it is written by none other than sinclair himself. The other references are either not relevant at all or by sinclair himself. The method has no mainstream acceptance that I can tell outside of Dr Sinclair's personal website mentioned above and apparently wikipedia.--
Literaturegeek |
T@1k? 21:54, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
reply