- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 03:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Sean Esbjörn-Hargens
- Sean Esbjörn-Hargens ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:PROF in the sense that his publications are all WP:FRINGE publications and do not count as independent sources. jps ( talk) 23:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Effectively an unsourced BLP, and I doubt very much that any reliable secondary sources will actually turn up. Sławomir Biały ( talk) 00:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia ( talk) 15:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia ( talk) 15:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing else convincing for the applicable notability, nothing to suggest keeping therefore. SwisterTwister talk 01:17, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 03:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Sean Esbjörn-Hargens
- Sean Esbjörn-Hargens ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:PROF in the sense that his publications are all WP:FRINGE publications and do not count as independent sources. jps ( talk) 23:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Effectively an unsourced BLP, and I doubt very much that any reliable secondary sources will actually turn up. Sławomir Biały ( talk) 00:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia ( talk) 15:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia ( talk) 15:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing else convincing for the applicable notability, nothing to suggest keeping therefore. SwisterTwister talk 01:17, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.