- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:46, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Scott Presler
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Scott Presler ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Proposed deletion for lack of notability. There simply is none. Citations in the entry are local publications (and several of the subject's own tweets) mentioning some trash cleanups he organized. One NBC.COM article about Gays for Trump in which he appears in a photo caption, but is not otherwise mentioned or quoted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marosci ( talk • contribs) 04:09, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 05:51, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 05:51, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. The article states nothing about him that is "inherently" notable enough to guarantee inclusion in an encyclopedia, and the referencing is not strong enough to get him over WP:GNG in lieu of having to pass any SNGs: once you discount all the self-published primary sources that aren't support for notability at all and the sources which mention his name but are not about him for the purposes of establishing his notability, the few left over that are actually reliable source coverage about him don't add up to enough. GNG, as always, is not just "count the footnotes and keep anything that meets or exceeds an arbitrary mumber": we also consider the depth of how substantively any source is or isn't about him, the geographic range of how widely he's getting covered, and the context of what he's getting covered for, not just the raw number of footnotes present. Bearcat ( talk) 15:39, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TNT. Likely product of undisclosed paid editing from a sockpuppet ring. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Juanafavour for details. — Newslinger talk 11:58, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:46, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Scott Presler
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Scott Presler ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Proposed deletion for lack of notability. There simply is none. Citations in the entry are local publications (and several of the subject's own tweets) mentioning some trash cleanups he organized. One NBC.COM article about Gays for Trump in which he appears in a photo caption, but is not otherwise mentioned or quoted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marosci ( talk • contribs) 04:09, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 05:51, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 05:51, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. The article states nothing about him that is "inherently" notable enough to guarantee inclusion in an encyclopedia, and the referencing is not strong enough to get him over WP:GNG in lieu of having to pass any SNGs: once you discount all the self-published primary sources that aren't support for notability at all and the sources which mention his name but are not about him for the purposes of establishing his notability, the few left over that are actually reliable source coverage about him don't add up to enough. GNG, as always, is not just "count the footnotes and keep anything that meets or exceeds an arbitrary mumber": we also consider the depth of how substantively any source is or isn't about him, the geographic range of how widely he's getting covered, and the context of what he's getting covered for, not just the raw number of footnotes present. Bearcat ( talk) 15:39, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TNT. Likely product of undisclosed paid editing from a sockpuppet ring. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Juanafavour for details. — Newslinger talk 11:58, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.