- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 00:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Rise to Ruins
- Rise to Ruins ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable video game. No references, couldn't find any good ones. Insert CleverPhrase Here 21:57, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete or draftify. Only major coverage comes from Rock, Paper, Shotgun (search for Retro-Pixel Castles), and it's just announcements. Wait until the article starts to have substantive reviews from multiple, reliable sources. If the author wants to work in draftspace, fine, otherwise deletion is the best route. (Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?)) czar 20:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete for not meeting WP:GNG with in-depth coverage from reliable sources. TonyBallioni ( talk) 01:06, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete with no prejudice to recreating in 6 months or so/moving to Draft space. I found surprisingly little coverage of this game except for some kickstarter announcements such as [1], [2], and [3]. I believe that it is very likely that when it is formally released, enough reviews will come out to provide significant coverage needed for WP:GNG. Winner 42 Talk to me! 19:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 00:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Rise to Ruins
- Rise to Ruins ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable video game. No references, couldn't find any good ones. Insert CleverPhrase Here 21:57, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete or draftify. Only major coverage comes from Rock, Paper, Shotgun (search for Retro-Pixel Castles), and it's just announcements. Wait until the article starts to have substantive reviews from multiple, reliable sources. If the author wants to work in draftspace, fine, otherwise deletion is the best route. (Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?)) czar 20:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete for not meeting WP:GNG with in-depth coverage from reliable sources. TonyBallioni ( talk) 01:06, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete with no prejudice to recreating in 6 months or so/moving to Draft space. I found surprisingly little coverage of this game except for some kickstarter announcements such as [1], [2], and [3]. I believe that it is very likely that when it is formally released, enough reviews will come out to provide significant coverage needed for WP:GNG. Winner 42 Talk to me! 19:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.