The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:31, 4 December 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:PROF, best claim to fame is the unsourced assertion that his work had an impact on one volume of one journal; two books mentioned are popular, not scholarly, and the ideas promoted are not significantly noteworthy or accepted within the discipline ( parental alienation is poorly accepted and nebulous, parental alienation syndrome more so and controversial, Warshak's own "parental alienation disorder" has even less history, controversy and acceptance. The intervention mentioned is a low-n study and it is far too early for it to have had any significant impact. The "Warshak Inventory for Child and Adolescent Assessment" referred to in the final paragraph turns up once on google scholar in a journal article that has nothing to do with it (actually an advertisement at the bottom of page 6/200). WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 01:35, 18 November 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:31, 4 December 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:PROF, best claim to fame is the unsourced assertion that his work had an impact on one volume of one journal; two books mentioned are popular, not scholarly, and the ideas promoted are not significantly noteworthy or accepted within the discipline ( parental alienation is poorly accepted and nebulous, parental alienation syndrome more so and controversial, Warshak's own "parental alienation disorder" has even less history, controversy and acceptance. The intervention mentioned is a low-n study and it is far too early for it to have had any significant impact. The "Warshak Inventory for Child and Adolescent Assessment" referred to in the final paragraph turns up once on google scholar in a journal article that has nothing to do with it (actually an advertisement at the bottom of page 6/200). WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 01:35, 18 November 2010 (UTC) reply