The result was keep. Discussion of a possible merge can and should continue on the talk page. Beeblebrox ( talk) 18:31, 6 September 2011 (UTC) reply
This article makes scientific and medical claims, so should satisfy WP:MEDRS. In fact, it has remained unsourced for three years, apart from a well-sourced criticism section, so does not even meet WP:RS. There is sufficient sourced material to make an article on "Criticism of Rasa shastra", but none for anything more. I have done a Google search in an attempt to find reliable sources, but not one site would appear to meet our standards for reliable sourcing, particularly the high standards required for those making medical claims. RexxS ( talk) 13:48, 29 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Kill it with fire per LuckyLouie. Inter change able| talk to me 21:11, 29 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Discussion of a possible merge can and should continue on the talk page. Beeblebrox ( talk) 18:31, 6 September 2011 (UTC) reply
This article makes scientific and medical claims, so should satisfy WP:MEDRS. In fact, it has remained unsourced for three years, apart from a well-sourced criticism section, so does not even meet WP:RS. There is sufficient sourced material to make an article on "Criticism of Rasa shastra", but none for anything more. I have done a Google search in an attempt to find reliable sources, but not one site would appear to meet our standards for reliable sourcing, particularly the high standards required for those making medical claims. RexxS ( talk) 13:48, 29 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Kill it with fire per LuckyLouie. Inter change able| talk to me 21:11, 29 August 2011 (UTC) reply