The result was delete. Courcelles 19:25, 22 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NOTE, lack of significant coverage from reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raëlian Church membership estimates and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honorary Guides of the Raëlian Movement. Majority of article is sourced repeatedly to "Raelian Contact", some sort of internal organization publication - a primary source directly affiliated with the group. -- Cirt ( talk) 15:53, 15 November 2010 (UTC) -- Cirt ( talk) 15:53, 15 November 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 19:25, 22 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NOTE, lack of significant coverage from reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raëlian Church membership estimates and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honorary Guides of the Raëlian Movement. Majority of article is sourced repeatedly to "Raelian Contact", some sort of internal organization publication - a primary source directly affiliated with the group. -- Cirt ( talk) 15:53, 15 November 2010 (UTC) -- Cirt ( talk) 15:53, 15 November 2010 (UTC) reply