- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. fails to advance an argument for deletion ( non-admin closure) B E C K Y S A Y L E S 07:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Professional open source
- Professional open source ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
there are multiple problems with Professional open source article
The neutrality of this article is disputed. (January 2017)
This article is written like a personal reflection or opinion essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings about a topic. (January 2017)
This article possibly contains original research. (January 2017)
This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. (January 2017)
This article contains weasel words: vague phrasing that often accompanies biased or unverifiable information. (January 2017)
This article needs to be updated. (February 2017)
if these problems don't get resolved then this article should be deleted Jonnymoon96 ( talk) 01:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 07:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 07:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. fails to advance an argument for deletion ( non-admin closure) B E C K Y S A Y L E S 07:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Professional open source
- Professional open source ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
there are multiple problems with Professional open source article
The neutrality of this article is disputed. (January 2017)
This article is written like a personal reflection or opinion essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings about a topic. (January 2017)
This article possibly contains original research. (January 2017)
This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. (January 2017)
This article contains weasel words: vague phrasing that often accompanies biased or unverifiable information. (January 2017)
This article needs to be updated. (February 2017)
if these problems don't get resolved then this article should be deleted Jonnymoon96 ( talk) 01:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 07:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 07:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.