- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. There have been no new comments since March 23rd despite three relistings so I'm closing this as No consensus. A possible Merge or Redirect can be discussed on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 02:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
PanEuropa Armenia
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- PanEuropa Armenia ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Branch of Paneuropean Union, merge into the article? IgelRM ( talk) 10:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Organizations and
Armenia.
IgelRM (
talk) 10:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Keep- There are thousands of stand-alone "branch organization" articles from unions, to student organizations, political parties, etc. In this case, PanEuropa Armenia is the only "PanEuropa" branch which has a Wiki article. Merging would mean giving the Armenian branch complete undue weight (
WP:RSUW) in the article. In addition, PEA highlights very topic specific activities which would seem totally out of place in Paneuropean Union. There are certain goals and objectives that the PEA focuses on that Paneuropean Union does not, and vice versa. Just as in the case that it wouldn't make sense to merge
Volt Italy into
Volt Europa. They focus on "country specific" issues that would be out of place in the main article. Regards,
Archives908 (
talk) 13:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- The issue is that the branch doesn't appear to have WP:SIGCOV. Which is different from party Volt, which country parties all have articles, so this is at least novel. Weight needs to be considered with a merge, but it can be more of a redirect if it is a problem. IgelRM ( talk) 14:16, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Keep- There are thousands of stand-alone "branch organization" articles from unions, to student organizations, political parties, etc. In this case, PanEuropa Armenia is the only "PanEuropa" branch which has a Wiki article. Merging would mean giving the Armenian branch complete undue weight (
WP:RSUW) in the article. In addition, PEA highlights very topic specific activities which would seem totally out of place in Paneuropean Union. There are certain goals and objectives that the PEA focuses on that Paneuropean Union does not, and vice versa. Just as in the case that it wouldn't make sense to merge
Volt Italy into
Volt Europa. They focus on "country specific" issues that would be out of place in the main article. Regards,
Archives908 (
talk) 13:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 10:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 12:37, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. There have been no new comments since March 23rd despite three relistings so I'm closing this as No consensus. A possible Merge or Redirect can be discussed on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 02:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
PanEuropa Armenia
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- PanEuropa Armenia ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Branch of Paneuropean Union, merge into the article? IgelRM ( talk) 10:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Organizations and
Armenia.
IgelRM (
talk) 10:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Keep- There are thousands of stand-alone "branch organization" articles from unions, to student organizations, political parties, etc. In this case, PanEuropa Armenia is the only "PanEuropa" branch which has a Wiki article. Merging would mean giving the Armenian branch complete undue weight (
WP:RSUW) in the article. In addition, PEA highlights very topic specific activities which would seem totally out of place in Paneuropean Union. There are certain goals and objectives that the PEA focuses on that Paneuropean Union does not, and vice versa. Just as in the case that it wouldn't make sense to merge
Volt Italy into
Volt Europa. They focus on "country specific" issues that would be out of place in the main article. Regards,
Archives908 (
talk) 13:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- The issue is that the branch doesn't appear to have WP:SIGCOV. Which is different from party Volt, which country parties all have articles, so this is at least novel. Weight needs to be considered with a merge, but it can be more of a redirect if it is a problem. IgelRM ( talk) 14:16, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Keep- There are thousands of stand-alone "branch organization" articles from unions, to student organizations, political parties, etc. In this case, PanEuropa Armenia is the only "PanEuropa" branch which has a Wiki article. Merging would mean giving the Armenian branch complete undue weight (
WP:RSUW) in the article. In addition, PEA highlights very topic specific activities which would seem totally out of place in Paneuropean Union. There are certain goals and objectives that the PEA focuses on that Paneuropean Union does not, and vice versa. Just as in the case that it wouldn't make sense to merge
Volt Italy into
Volt Europa. They focus on "country specific" issues that would be out of place in the main article. Regards,
Archives908 (
talk) 13:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 10:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 12:37, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.