- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Oxland
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Oxland ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldnt find anything that made this building notable, I couldnt even find if it was actually added to the National Register of Historic Places. It does not fail WP:GNG but it is somewhat unnotable. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 06:45, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Louisiana. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 06:45, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep if it was on the NRHP per
WP:GEOFEAT. And it
certainly appears to have been. Looks like it was probably delisted because it's
been allowed to fall into ruin, but notability is not temporary.
It does not fail WP:GNG but it is somewhat unnotable
seems to be a bit of a subjective statement. If it passes GNG then what's the problem other than WP:IDONTLIKEIT? -- Necrothesp ( talk) 10:09, 22 November 2022 (UTC) - Keep - the nom says it meets the GNG. It is therefore notable. JMWt ( talk) 11:16, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Oxland
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Oxland ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldnt find anything that made this building notable, I couldnt even find if it was actually added to the National Register of Historic Places. It does not fail WP:GNG but it is somewhat unnotable. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 06:45, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Louisiana. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 06:45, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep if it was on the NRHP per
WP:GEOFEAT. And it
certainly appears to have been. Looks like it was probably delisted because it's
been allowed to fall into ruin, but notability is not temporary.
It does not fail WP:GNG but it is somewhat unnotable
seems to be a bit of a subjective statement. If it passes GNG then what's the problem other than WP:IDONTLIKEIT? -- Necrothesp ( talk) 10:09, 22 November 2022 (UTC) - Keep - the nom says it meets the GNG. It is therefore notable. JMWt ( talk) 11:16, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.