The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Per
WP:NGEO named natural features are notable. The park is home to Clifton Springs and the park entry is where the springs are covered. The park and springs also have very substantial coverage so pass GNG. They are historically and geographically significant. KeepFloridaArmy (
talk) 14:56, 4 March 2018 (UTC)reply
delete This is not a named natural feature, whatever legitimacy
WP:NGEO has. city parks lacking coverage outside the area are routinely deleted.
Mangoe (
talk) 19:36, 5 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
TonyBallioni (
talk) 15:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. The Clifton Springs are a named, notable geographic feature. If this is a dispute about article title, start a
wp:RM to move coverage of the geographic feature + park which includes it to the feature name, rather than the park name. Personally, I think it is obvious that the park is larger and the natural title for the article is the park name. Also, municipal parks are IMO usually found to be notable, from experience with many other AFDs, though being with a major urban area instead of relatively remote usually helps. --
Doncram (
talk) 21:48, 12 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep and consider expanding and renaming to an article about the park in which this spring is located, as per DonCram. Although my searches also turned up sources mentioning and describing this natural spring, which is, unsurprisingly, older than the park.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 00:29, 19 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment- the article is supposed to be about the park, not the springs. The argument is now being made that the springs are notable. However, there doesn't appear to be many sources to back that up either.--
Rusf10 (
talk) 01:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)reply
The springs are a major feature of the park. And they are covered very substantially in reliable independent sources along with the park.
FloridaArmy (
talk) 02:00, 19 March 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Per
WP:NGEO named natural features are notable. The park is home to Clifton Springs and the park entry is where the springs are covered. The park and springs also have very substantial coverage so pass GNG. They are historically and geographically significant. KeepFloridaArmy (
talk) 14:56, 4 March 2018 (UTC)reply
delete This is not a named natural feature, whatever legitimacy
WP:NGEO has. city parks lacking coverage outside the area are routinely deleted.
Mangoe (
talk) 19:36, 5 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
TonyBallioni (
talk) 15:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. The Clifton Springs are a named, notable geographic feature. If this is a dispute about article title, start a
wp:RM to move coverage of the geographic feature + park which includes it to the feature name, rather than the park name. Personally, I think it is obvious that the park is larger and the natural title for the article is the park name. Also, municipal parks are IMO usually found to be notable, from experience with many other AFDs, though being with a major urban area instead of relatively remote usually helps. --
Doncram (
talk) 21:48, 12 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep and consider expanding and renaming to an article about the park in which this spring is located, as per DonCram. Although my searches also turned up sources mentioning and describing this natural spring, which is, unsurprisingly, older than the park.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 00:29, 19 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment- the article is supposed to be about the park, not the springs. The argument is now being made that the springs are notable. However, there doesn't appear to be many sources to back that up either.--
Rusf10 (
talk) 01:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)reply
The springs are a major feature of the park. And they are covered very substantially in reliable independent sources along with the park.
FloridaArmy (
talk) 02:00, 19 March 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.