- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 02:10, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Overlook Park (Bethel, Connecticut)
- Overlook Park (Bethel, Connecticut) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:GNG. There is no significant reliable source coverage. Even the town's website has virtually no information on the park. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:26, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. MT Train Discuss 03:37, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 08:07, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 08:07, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 17:46, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete no proof of notability, and coverage is unlikely to exist outside of local sources. PROD was declined commentless, so we don't know why someone felt this was controversial. Deletion makes sense here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 01:05, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 02:10, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Overlook Park (Bethel, Connecticut)
- Overlook Park (Bethel, Connecticut) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:GNG. There is no significant reliable source coverage. Even the town's website has virtually no information on the park. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:26, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. MT Train Discuss 03:37, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 08:07, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 08:07, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 17:46, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete no proof of notability, and coverage is unlikely to exist outside of local sources. PROD was declined commentless, so we don't know why someone felt this was controversial. Deletion makes sense here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 01:05, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.