The result was no consensus. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 20:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC) reply
non-notable - upon carrying out due diligence, it appears that there are no reliable third party articles about Obelisk International. This is supported by the improper referencing on the article, whereby none of the references even mention Obelisk International and seem to simply be websites of reputable organisations which either just talk about Brazilian social housing or aren't relevant to the subject at all. In no way do any of them demonstrate Obelisk International's notability. Samstreet133 ( talk) 09:18, 30 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 20:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC) reply
non-notable - upon carrying out due diligence, it appears that there are no reliable third party articles about Obelisk International. This is supported by the improper referencing on the article, whereby none of the references even mention Obelisk International and seem to simply be websites of reputable organisations which either just talk about Brazilian social housing or aren't relevant to the subject at all. In no way do any of them demonstrate Obelisk International's notability. Samstreet133 ( talk) 09:18, 30 May 2013 (UTC) reply