The result was keep. Jayjg (talk) 01:16, 25 November 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a holding company for Unification Church owned news media, including the famous Washington Times and other lesser known outlets. Unlike its owner, and some of its subsidiaries, News World Communications has not been the subject of in depth secondary coverage and so is not WP:Notable. Kitfoxxe ( talk) 20:41, 18 November 2009 (UTC) reply
I'm afraid, Hrafn, that this is one of those places where the letter of policy needs to give way to WP:COMMON and the consensus clearly demonstrated in the above discussion. Our editorial judgment is that the Washington Times, as a source, is strong enough to overcome the natural concern editors feel about sources that aren't completely independent.— S Marshall Talk/ Cont 17:36, 19 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Jayjg (talk) 01:16, 25 November 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a holding company for Unification Church owned news media, including the famous Washington Times and other lesser known outlets. Unlike its owner, and some of its subsidiaries, News World Communications has not been the subject of in depth secondary coverage and so is not WP:Notable. Kitfoxxe ( talk) 20:41, 18 November 2009 (UTC) reply
I'm afraid, Hrafn, that this is one of those places where the letter of policy needs to give way to WP:COMMON and the consensus clearly demonstrated in the above discussion. Our editorial judgment is that the Washington Times, as a source, is strong enough to overcome the natural concern editors feel about sources that aren't completely independent.— S Marshall Talk/ Cont 17:36, 19 November 2009 (UTC) reply