The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Peter Davenport runs this one-person organization that simply collects hearsay reports of UFOs. Not a notable
organization. No
independent notice by non-ufological sources.
jps (
talk) 16:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - Shook it up, added lots of sources. As the organisation Arizona law officials turned to during the
Phoenix Lights incident, I'd say that's pretty good for notability on its own - but they've been in USA today more than once, and The Times, etc.
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:25, 9 November 2014 (UTC)reply
But definitely: The scope of their activities is national or international in scale. The organization has received significant coverage in multiple[1] reliable sources that are independent of the organization.PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:28, 9 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep Sources have been added, this now meets notability requirements.
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 02:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep the nom statement seems to suggest that the organization is not notable because it is small and collects hearsay reports. If an organization has received enough coverage to be notable, which does apppear to have happened here, it doesn't really matter what the organization's purpose or size is.
Mellowed Fillmore (
talk) 03:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Peter Davenport runs this one-person organization that simply collects hearsay reports of UFOs. Not a notable
organization. No
independent notice by non-ufological sources.
jps (
talk) 16:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - Shook it up, added lots of sources. As the organisation Arizona law officials turned to during the
Phoenix Lights incident, I'd say that's pretty good for notability on its own - but they've been in USA today more than once, and The Times, etc.
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:25, 9 November 2014 (UTC)reply
But definitely: The scope of their activities is national or international in scale. The organization has received significant coverage in multiple[1] reliable sources that are independent of the organization.PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:28, 9 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep Sources have been added, this now meets notability requirements.
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 02:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep the nom statement seems to suggest that the organization is not notable because it is small and collects hearsay reports. If an organization has received enough coverage to be notable, which does apppear to have happened here, it doesn't really matter what the organization's purpose or size is.
Mellowed Fillmore (
talk) 03:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.