The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete --
Stormie (
talk) 08:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete unsourced one-liner about a given name, with no indication that this name is significant; WP is not a baby-naming guide.
Carlossuarez46 (
talk) 20:38, 14 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete Not significant in itself. can be useful as part of a larger article on naming trends or popular names.
ChiragPatnaik (
talk) 11:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete --
Stormie (
talk) 08:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete unsourced one-liner about a given name, with no indication that this name is significant; WP is not a baby-naming guide.
Carlossuarez46 (
talk) 20:38, 14 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete Not significant in itself. can be useful as part of a larger article on naming trends or popular names.
ChiragPatnaik (
talk) 11:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.