- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 02:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Mobile Marriott
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mobile Marriott ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD. The article makes no claim for general notability WP:GNG or historic, social, economic, or architectural importance per WP:NBUILD. Sources in the article are four database entries, one government database listing for "Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act National Master List", and a brief two sentence mention on the designer's website. WP:BEFORE revealed advertising, WP:ROUTINE, WP:MILL coverage, and directory style listings. This is a normal hotel, not an encyclopedic topic. // Timothy :: talk 15:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 15:36, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 15:36, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Perhaps too soon, it might one day be recognized as a late 20th Century modern architectural marvel. Otherwise just a concrete hotel from the 70's. Oaktree b ( talk) 16:10, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Weak delete - arguably, as once the tallest building in a state, it has a claim to notability. Nonetheless, it fails my standards for skyscrapers. Bearian ( talk) 21:49, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 02:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Mobile Marriott
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mobile Marriott ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD. The article makes no claim for general notability WP:GNG or historic, social, economic, or architectural importance per WP:NBUILD. Sources in the article are four database entries, one government database listing for "Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act National Master List", and a brief two sentence mention on the designer's website. WP:BEFORE revealed advertising, WP:ROUTINE, WP:MILL coverage, and directory style listings. This is a normal hotel, not an encyclopedic topic. // Timothy :: talk 15:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 15:36, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 15:36, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Perhaps too soon, it might one day be recognized as a late 20th Century modern architectural marvel. Otherwise just a concrete hotel from the 70's. Oaktree b ( talk) 16:10, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Weak delete - arguably, as once the tallest building in a state, it has a claim to notability. Nonetheless, it fails my standards for skyscrapers. Bearian ( talk) 21:49, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.